These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8015139)

  • 1. Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review.
    Judson HF
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 8015139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publishing paradigms.
    Nat Genet; 1999 Apr; 21(4):341-2. PubMed ID: 10192374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial.
    Weisse T
    Eur J Protistol; 2015 Apr; 51(2):A1-2. PubMed ID: 26008765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plus ça change..
    Squires BP
    CMAJ; 1997 Dec; 157(12):1720-1. PubMed ID: 9441037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. All the sourcing not fit to print: citing electronic material in your article.
    Rice J
    Chest; 2008 Jun; 133(6):1524-1526. PubMed ID: 18574300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Burgeoning blogosphere serves as new vehicle for medical information.
    Natinsky P
    Mich Med; 2006; 105(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 16771159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rewarding reviewers, tracking our authors and selective electronic publication.
    Harris JP
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):217-218. PubMed ID: 28371034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):264. PubMed ID: 12124587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between the paper mills and the World Wide Web.
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Jan; 135(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 25589098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends and future challenges in medical editing.
    Akhtar J
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jan; 21(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 21276375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflections on pediatric research.
    Zipursky A
    Pediatr Res; 2003 Dec; 54(6):790. PubMed ID: 14605239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges for editors.
    Wagner BM
    Toxicol Pathol; 1997; 25(4):410-1. PubMed ID: 9280128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Entire-paper plagiarism caught by software.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):715. PubMed ID: 18843325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Too much of a good thing….
    Julian T
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):371. PubMed ID: 24077310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Headache online.
    Schwedt TJ; Roberts J
    Headache; 2010 May; 50(5):736-7. PubMed ID: 20546319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?
    Frishauf P
    MedGenMed; 2006 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 16915135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Traditional publications: an endangered species?
    Marcus A
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Feb; 58(2 Suppl):S149-52. PubMed ID: 18240269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experts plan to reclaim the web for pop science.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):516-7. PubMed ID: 16452941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts].
    Göbel U; Gortner L
    Klin Padiatr; 2010 Jul; 222(4):231-3. PubMed ID: 20665364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.