These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8015439)

  • 1. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock--a simulation study.
    Holland BR; Penny D; Hendy MD
    Syst Biol; 2003 Apr; 52(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 12746148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate reconstruction of a known HIV-1 transmission history by phylogenetic tree analysis.
    Leitner T; Escanilla D; Franzén C; Uhlén M; Albert J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Oct; 93(20):10864-9. PubMed ID: 8855273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Getting a tree fast: Neighbor Joining, FastME, and distance-based methods.
    Desper R; Gascuel O
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; Chapter 6():Unit 6.3. PubMed ID: 18428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference.
    Ogden TH; Rosenberg MS
    Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 16611602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Generalized neighbor-joining: more reliable phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Pearson WR; Robins G; Zhang T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Jun; 16(6):806-16. PubMed ID: 10368958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternating least squares approach to inferring phylogenies from pairwise distances.
    Felsenstein J
    Syst Biol; 1997 Mar; 46(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 11975348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction.
    Bruno WJ; Socci ND; Halpern AL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Jan; 17(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 10666718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement of distance-based phylogenetic methods by a local maximum likelihood approach using triplets.
    Ranwez V; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Nov; 19(11):1952-63. PubMed ID: 12411604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.