137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8017500)
1. When a living will is ignored.
Edwards BS
Am J Nurs; 1994 Jul; 94(7):64-5. PubMed ID: 8017500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
Denbo SM
Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal trends in bioethics.
Onel S; Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 1392051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Of dead brains, living wills, and autonomy.
Lehman LB
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1991 Jan; 26(1):39-42, 45-8. PubMed ID: 1898946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician's experience: elderly patients.
Meier DE
Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):385-7; discussion 398-402. PubMed ID: 1753973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill.
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of the Cruzan decisions for nurses.
Murphy P
N J Nurse; 1990; 20(5):7. PubMed ID: 2216680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ohio's new living will legislation.
Ohio Med; 1991 Jul; 87(7):321-2. PubMed ID: 1870829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Living wills: making life and death decisions.
Riley JM
Provider; 1991 Feb; 17(2):14-8, 20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10109049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How do the Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care (DNRCC) and the Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest) protocols differ?
Morris K
Ohio Nurses Rev; 2001 Feb; 76(2):16. PubMed ID: 15726853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Position statement on laws and regulations concerning life-sustaining treatment, including artificial nutrition and hydration, for patients lacking decision-making capacity.
Kothare SV; Altman AM; Rodriguez IN
Neurology; 2008 Jan; 70(3):242; author reply 242-3. PubMed ID: 18195272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Patients' rights--living wills ignored. Interview by Kirsten Bjørnsson].
Kirkegaard LW
Sygeplejersken; 1993 Nov; 93(47):8-10. PubMed ID: 8042185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Terminating artificial nutrition and hydration in persistent vegetative state patients: current and proposed state laws.
Machado C
Neurology; 2007 Jan; 68(4):312; author reply 312-3. PubMed ID: 17242347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Ray.
Avila D
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 8354628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion.
Stacy T
Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Enforcement problems arising from conflicting views of living wills in the legal, medical and patient communities.
Webster P
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2001; 62(4):793-813. PubMed ID: 12774779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician responsibilities under new living will law.
Ohio Med; 1991 Oct; 87(10):504-9, 515-6. PubMed ID: 1749577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Patient Self-Determination Act: benefit or burden?
Moss AH
W V Med J; 1991 Nov; 87(11):510-3. PubMed ID: 1819875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The living will.
Rizzolo PJ
J Fam Pract; 1978 Apr; 6(4):881-5. PubMed ID: 641470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
