These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 801831)
1. [Reliability of silicone elastomer for impressions]. Deyrolle G Inf Dent; 1975 Oct; 57(41):45-50. PubMed ID: 801831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials. Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes. Nilner K; Owall B Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface texture of stone model setting against elastomer impression materials. Nanami T; Ostlund SG Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 6395418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Bond between wash elastomers and putty silicones]. Pfeiffer P; Sommer MP; Schwickerath H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jul; 46(7):464-7. PubMed ID: 1817908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An update on elastomeric impression materials. Brown D Br Dent J; 1981 Jan; 150(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 7006650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Linear dimensional variations of silicone-elastomers in the double impression technic]. Schwindling P Riv Ital Odontotec; 1981; 17(6):42-52. PubMed ID: 6761747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of removing methods on the deformation of impression--especially of vinyl silicone rubber impression materials immediately after removal]. Tani T; Kanamori K; Kamiya K; Mizuno T; Asai T; Kondo M; Senda A Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1986 Jun; 24(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 3538927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The correction of primary impressions in complete dentures]. Mariani P; Pons G Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1984; 13(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 6372017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Studies on the new combined impression method with different types of silicone impression materials]. Yamamoto T; Osano M; Seki S; Kikkawa H; Hanamura N Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 7006174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials. Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cavity impression method utilizing the properties of elastomer impression material]. Sugishita H; Shuko K; Senda A; Kaji M; Makiuchi M Shikai Tenbo; 1978; 51(5):1047-8. PubMed ID: 397070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials. Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]