128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8019342)
1. Usefulness and safety of pirenzepine in double-contrast study of upper gastrointestinal tract: comparison with scopolamine methylbromide.
Braccini G; Marraccini P; Marrucci A; Boraschi P; Falaschi F; Testa R; Bartolozzi C
Abdom Imaging; 1994; 19(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8019342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Usefulness of pirenzepine in the study of the upper digestive tract and the large intestine with double contrast media: comparison with scopolamine methylbromide].
Braccini G; Marraccini P; Boraschi P; Marrucci A; Bertellotti L; Testa R
Radiol Med; 1996 Dec; 92(6):733-7. PubMed ID: 9122463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pirenzepine versus scopolamine methyl bromide in double-contrast barium enema study of large bowel.
Marraccini P; Braccini G; Marrucci A; Boraschi P; Bertellotti L; Testa R
Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 8661571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective antagonism by pirenzepine and N-methyl-scopolamine on muscarinic receptor subtypes of the rat vas deferens.
Miranda HF; Silva WI; Wolstenholme WW; Cuevas N
Gen Pharmacol; 1988; 19(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 3417103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Action and side effects of small doses of buscopan in gastroduodenal radiography. A prospective study in 300 patients.
Hüpscher DN; Dommerholt O
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 6561120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cimetropium bromide as a relaxant for the radiological examination of the stomach and duodenum.
Frigerio A; Temporelli A; Imbimbo BP; Muzio F
Curr Med Res Opin; 1986; 10(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 3816292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double contrast examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Kelvin FM
South Med J; 1979 Jun; 72(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 451647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat forebrain.
Pavia J; Marquez E; Laukkonen S; Martos F; Gómez A; Sánchez de la Cuesta F
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Dec; 13(10):653-60. PubMed ID: 1770828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative studies of the effects of some antimuscarinic agents on gastric damage and pupillary reflex in the rat.
Daniotti S; Del Soldato P
Br J Pharmacol; 1984 Jun; 82(2):305-7. PubMed ID: 6547361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Single evening administration of a new antimuscarinic agent telenzepine in therapy of acute duodenal ulcer. Results of a randomized double-blind comparative study versus pirenzepine].
Dammann HG; Dreyer M; Wolf N; Müller P; Merk-Härtelt B; Simon B
Z Gastroenterol; 1989 Apr; 27(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 2658396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two antimuscarinic drugs, pirenzepine and propantheline, on gastric acid secretion, serum gastrin concentration, salivary flow and heart rate in patients with duodenal ulcer disease.
Richardson CT; Barnett CC; Walsh JH; Feldman M
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 1987 Aug; 1(4):281-91. PubMed ID: 2979673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of the muscarinic receptor subtype in isolated gastric fundic cells of the rabbit.
Baudiere B; Monferini E; Giraldo E; Ladinsky H; Bali JP
Biochem Pharmacol; 1987 Sep; 36(18):2957-61. PubMed ID: 3632720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autoradiographic localization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in visual areas of cat brain: variations in sensitivity of N-[3H]methylscopolamine binding sites to carbachol and pirenzepine.
Cymerman U; Palacios JM; Cortés R; Skangiel-Kramska J
Neurosci Lett; 1987 Oct; 81(1-2):13-8. PubMed ID: 3696462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scopolamine and methylscopolamine differentially affect fixed-consecutive-number performance of male and female Wistar rats.
van Haaren F; van Hest A; van Hattum T
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Jun; 33(2):361-5. PubMed ID: 2813474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of pirenzepine, an M1 antimuscarinic agent, for effort myocardial ischemia.
Marraccini P; Orsini E; Nassi G; Michelassi C; L'Abbate A
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 69(17):1407-11. PubMed ID: 1590228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of aging on the interaction of quinuclidinyl benzilate, N-methylscopolamine, pirenzepine, and gallamine with brain muscarinic receptors.
Surichamorn W; Kim ON; Lee NH; Lai WS; el-Fakahany EE
Neurochem Res; 1988 Dec; 13(12):1183-91. PubMed ID: 3237310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radioligand binding characteristics of the chicken cardiac muscarinic receptor.
Michel AD; Whiting RL
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 1989 Sep; 340(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 2812039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The minimum effective dose of glucagon in upper gastrointestinal radiography.
Maglinte DD; Caudill LD; Krol KL; Chernish SM; Brown DL
Gastrointest Radiol; 1982; 7(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 7084592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subclasses of muscarinic receptors and pirenzepine. Further experimental evidence.
Hammer R
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1982; 72():59-67. PubMed ID: 6957998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pharmacological characterization of the aminopyridazine SR 95639A, a selective M1 muscarinic agonist.
Schumacher C; Steinberg R; Kan JP; Michaud JC; Bourguignon JJ; Wermuth CG; Feltz P; Worms P; Biziere K
Eur J Pharmacol; 1989 Jul; 166(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 2792188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
