BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8019583)

  • 1. Extension to the use of tolerance intervals for the assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Esinhart JD; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 8019583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On TIER method for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Ju HL
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 9056589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A two one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Liu J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 9056588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On assessment of bioequivalence under a higher-order crossover design.
    Chow SC; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):239-56. PubMed ID: 1300216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discussion of individual bioequivalence by M.-L. Chen.
    Gould AL
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9056584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual bioequivalence--a European perspective.
    Steinijans VW; Hauschke D
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9056585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size considerations for assessing individual bioequivalence based on the method of tolerance intervals.
    Esinhart JD; Chinchilli VM
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Jan; 32(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 8199749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioequivalence and intrasubject variability.
    Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 1844697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of bioequivalence using a multiplicative model.
    Chow SC; Peace KE; Shao J
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 1844696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.
    Hauck WW; Anderson S
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992 May; 30(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 1592546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The assessment of individual and population bioequivalence.
    Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1996 Mar; 6(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 8838775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
    Vuorinen J; Turunen J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2635-55. PubMed ID: 8981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for the evaluation of individual bioequivalence.
    Endrenyi L
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Sep; 32(9):497-508. PubMed ID: 7820334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A log-normal model for individual bioequivalence.
    Phillips KF
    J Biopharm Stat; 1993 Sep; 3(2):185-201. PubMed ID: 8220403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple testing for bioequivalence with pharmacokinetic data in 2 x 2 crossover designs.
    Chen YI; Huang CS
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(28):3567-79. PubMed ID: 19760611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing individual bioequivalence using the structural equation model.
    Carrasco JL; Jover L
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):901-12. PubMed ID: 12627408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The analysis of bioequivalence with respect to TMAX under a 2 x 2 crossover design.
    Have TR; Ten Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Jul; 5(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 7581427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comment on so-called individual criteria of bioequivalence.
    Wellek S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9056583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing bioequivalence using genomic data.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Li L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 15587969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of individual and population bioequivalence using the probability that bioavailabilities are similar.
    Schall R
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):615-26. PubMed ID: 7662849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.