These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8019583)

  • 21. Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 250/125 mg combination tablets in healthy human volunteers: use of replicate design approach.
    Idkaidek NM; Al-Ghazawi A; Najib NM
    Biopharm Drug Dispos; 2004 Dec; 25(9):367-72. PubMed ID: 15495146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On population and individual bioequivalence.
    Schall R; Luus HG
    Stat Med; 1993 Jun; 12(12):1109-24. PubMed ID: 8210816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bayesian modeling of multivariate average bioequivalence.
    Ghosh P; Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2402-19. PubMed ID: 18095275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Model-based analyses of bioequivalence crossover trials using the stochastic approximation expectation maximisation algorithm.
    Dubois A; Lavielle M; Gsteiger S; Pigeolet E; Mentré F
    Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(21):2582-600. PubMed ID: 21793036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A semi-parametric Bayesian approach to average bioequivalence.
    Ghosh P; Rosner GL
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(6):1224-36. PubMed ID: 16832840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bioequivalence of two film-coated tablets of imatinib mesylate 400 mg: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, fasting, two-period, two-sequence crossover comparison in healthy male South American volunteers.
    Parrillo-Campiglia S; Ercoli MC; Umpierrez O; Rodríguez P; Márquez S; Guarneri C; Estevez-Parrillo FT; Laurenz M; Estevez-Carrizo FE
    Clin Ther; 2009 Oct; 31(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 19922893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tests for individual and population bioequivalence based on generalized p-values.
    McNally RJ; Iyer H; Mathew T
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):31-53. PubMed ID: 12486750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Review and use of decision rules for bioequivalence trials].
    Nicolas P; Tod M; Petitjean O
    Therapie; 1993; 48(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8356540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S37-43. PubMed ID: 1601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alternative confidence intervals for the assessment of bioequivalence in four-period cross-over designs.
    Quiroz J; Ting N; Wei GC; Burdick RK
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1825-47. PubMed ID: 12111892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consideration of individual bioequivalence.
    Anderson S; Hauck WW
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1990 Jun; 18(3):259-73. PubMed ID: 2380920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1991 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2004861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 2307548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.
    Diletti E; Hauschke D; Steinijans VW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S51-8. PubMed ID: 1601532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asymmetry of the mean-variability tradeoff raises questions about the model in investigations of individual bioequivalence.
    Endrenyi L; Hao Y
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1998 Aug; 36(8):450-7. PubMed ID: 9726700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Applying multilevel models in evaluation of bioequivalence (I)].
    Liu QL; Shen ZZ; Chen F; Li XS; Yang M
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 30(12):1302-6. PubMed ID: 20193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choice of student's t- or Wilcoxon-based confidence intervals for assessment of average bioequivalence.
    Hauck WW; Hauschke D; Diletti E; Bois FY; Steinijans VW; Anderson S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 9056597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Average bioequivalence for two-sequence two-period crossover design with incomplete data.
    Lee JY; Kim BC; Park SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):857-67. PubMed ID: 16078389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Equivalence assessment for interchangeability based on two-sided tests.
    Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1312-31. PubMed ID: 25032976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mean difference vs. variability reduction: tradeoffs in aggregate measures for individual bioequivalence. FDA Individual Bioequivalence Working Group.
    Hauck WW; Chen ML; Hyslop T; Patnaik R; Schuirmann D; Williams R
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Dec; 34(12):535-41. PubMed ID: 8996848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.