140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8020523)
1. Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol.
Ugolotti U; Larini P; Marcato C; Cusmano F; Puccianti F
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S77-82. PubMed ID: 8020523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of iomeprol in renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
Simonetti G; Guazzaroni M; Carpanese L; Canalis GC; Urigo F
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S73-6. PubMed ID: 8020522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs.
Valentini AL; Tartaglione T; Monti L; Marano P
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S88-92. PubMed ID: 8020525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-blind comparison of safety and efficacy of iomeprol and iopamidol in carotid digital subtraction angiography.
Beltramello A; Piovan E; Rosta L
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S67-72. PubMed ID: 8020521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
Schmid I; Didier D; Pfammatter T; Garachemani A; Fleisch M; Kirchin MA; Meier B
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography.
Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol.
Kozuka T; Katayama H; Ebata K
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S109-14. PubMed ID: 8020512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Four-detector row computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of infrarenal aorta and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: influence of contrast medium concentration.
Iezzi R; Cotroneo AR; Filippone A; Giancristofaro D; Storto ML
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):690-6. PubMed ID: 18830096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Iomeprol: current and future profile of a radiocontrast agent.
Katayama H; Spinazzi A; Fouillet X; Kirchin MA; Taroni P; Davies A
Invest Radiol; 2001 Feb; 36(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 11224756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison.
Fattori R; Piva R; Schicchi F; Pancrazi A; Gabrielli G; Marzocchi A; Piovaccari G; Blandini A; Magnani B
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 8020520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the contrast density of iomeprol.
Schmiedel E
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S97-103. PubMed ID: 8020527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomised controlled trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) in cardiac catheterisation.
Vijayalakshmi K; Kunadian B; Wright RA; Hall JA; Stewart MJ; Davies A; Sutton A; de Belder MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 17101256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for digital subtraction arteriography.
Weiss JP; McLean GK; Modic MT; Rees CR; Higashida RT
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S84-92. PubMed ID: 8071051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iomeprol vs iopamidol in intraarterial peripheral digital subtraction angiography.
Dacoronias D; Minguzzi P; Ugolotti U; Dettori AG
Angiology; 1992 Sep; 43(9):734-40. PubMed ID: 1514709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers.
Manke C; Marcus C; Page A; Puey J; Batakis O; Fog A
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 14616202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Less iodine injected for the same diagnostic performances: comparison of two low-osmolar contrast agents (iobitridol 350 and iopamidol 370) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a randomized double-blind clinical study.
Velázquez MT; Albarrán A; Hernández F; García Tejada J; Zueco J; Andreu J; De la Torre JM; Figueroa A; Sainz F; Tascón J
Acta Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 65(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 20821930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the adverse effects of iomeprol.
Schmiedel E
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S104-8. PubMed ID: 8020511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical utility and safety profile of iomeprol.
Rosati G
Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S120-4. PubMed ID: 8020514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double blind comparison of Iomeprol 350 and Iopamidol 340 in intravenous digital subtraction angiography for peripheral vascular disease.
Simmons MJ; Waite DW; Galland RB; Torrie EP
Clin Radiol; 1992 May; 45(5):338-9. PubMed ID: 1516345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
