155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8020841)
1. Comparison of the Z-sampler and Novak endometrial biopsy instruments for in-office diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Krawisz BR; Johnson KK; Broste SK
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jul; 54(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 8020841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histopathologic adequacy of office endometrial biopsies taken with the Z-sampler and Novak curette in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Larson DM; Broste SK
J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 8040848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Johnson KK; Broste SK; Krawisz BR; Kresl JJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 7784020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette.
Hill GA; Herbert CM; Parker RA; Wentz AC
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Leitao MM; Kehoe S; Barakat RR; Alektiar K; Gattoc LP; Rabbitt C; Chi DS; Soslow RA; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 19167049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Incidence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia or FIGO stage IA carcinoma diagnosed on endometrial biopsy or endometrial resection].
Ploteau S; Squifflet JL; Berlière M; Marbaix E; Donnez J
Bull Cancer; 2008 May; 95(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 18541521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Kevorkian curette. An appraisal of its effectiveness in endometrial evaluation.
Ferenczy A; Shore M; Guralnick M; Gelfand MM
Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Aug; 54(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 460766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments.
Silver MM; Miles P; Rosa C
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):828-30. PubMed ID: 1923207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
Guido RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Rulin MC; Christopherson WA
J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective evaluation of an endometrial suction curette.
Nolan TE; Smith RP; Smith MT; Gallup DC
J Gynecol Surg; 1992; 8(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10148372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Del Priore G; Williams R; Harbatkin CB; Wan LS; Mittal K; Yang GC
J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of endometrial aspiration biopsy techniques: specimen adequacy.
Sierecki AR; Gudipudi DK; Montemarano N; Del Priore G
J Reprod Med; 2008 Oct; 53(10):760-4. PubMed ID: 19004401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial sampling prior to hysterectomy.
Stovall TG; Solomon SK; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):405-9. PubMed ID: 2915864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial biopsy using a plastic curette (Mi-Mark).
Ansari AH; Essien JD; Hoffman D; Ansari VM
Int J Fertil; 1981; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 6113208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Trimble CL; Kauderer J; Zaino R; Silverberg S; Lim PC; Burke JJ; Alberts D; Curtin J
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):812-9. PubMed ID: 16400639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma using the Endo-pap sampler.
Palermo VG; Blythe JG; Kaufman RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 3969241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator.
Kaunitz AM; Masciello A; Ostrowski M; Rovira EZ
J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 3385697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
Henig I; Chan P; Tredway DR; Maw GM; Gullett AJ; Cheatwood M
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
Williams AR; Brechin S; Porter AJ; Warner P; Critchley HO
BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.
Check JH; Chase JS; Nowroozi K; Wu CH; Chern R
J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2724236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
