127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8022142)
1. [Usefulness and limitation of digital rectal examination and imaging studies in staging prostate cancer].
Egawa S; Kawakami T; Nishimaki H; Kuwao S; Uchida T; Yokoyama E; Mashimo S; Koshiba K
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 85(5):792-801. PubMed ID: 8022142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer.
Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P
Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 11C-choline positron-emission tomography/computed tomography and transrectal ultrasonography for staging localized prostate cancer.
Rinnab L; Blumstein NM; Mottaghy FM; Hautmann RE; Küfer R; Hohl K; Reske SN
BJU Int; 2007 Jun; 99(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 17355373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of transrectal MRI in the staging of localized prostate cancer].
Pariente JL; Jacob F; Trillaud H; Deminiere C; Khan H; Ferrière JM; Grenier N; Le Guillou M
Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 9273074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The digital rectal exam, prostate-specific antigen and transrectal echography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer].
Martínez de Hurtado J; Chéchile Toniolo G; Villavicencio Mavrich H
Arch Esp Urol; 1995 Apr; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7538749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of localized prostatic carcinoma. A pilot study.
Rørvik J; Servoll E; Halvorsen OJ
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 1992; 26(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 1631502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer.
Mullerad M; Hricak H; Kuroiwa K; Pucar D; Chen HN; Kattan MW; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2158-63. PubMed ID: 16280755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer - by digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography?
Hsu CY; Joniau S; Oyen R; Roskams T; Van Poppel H
BJU Int; 2006 Nov; 98(5):982-5. PubMed ID: 16945120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting extracapsular extension in intermediate and high - risk prostate cancer.
Dominguez C; Plata M; Cataño JG; Palau M; Aguirre D; Narvaez J; Trujillo S; Gómez F; Trujillo CG; Caicedo JI; Medina C
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(4):688-696. PubMed ID: 29570254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men.
Mettlin C; Lee F; Drago J; Murphy GP
Cancer; 1991 Jun; 67(12):2949-58. PubMed ID: 1710531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer.
May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11121995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of transrectal ultrasound in preoperative staging of prostate cancer.
Colombo T; Schips L; Augustin H; Gruber H; Hebel P; Petritsch PH; Hubmer G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 1999 Mar; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10222753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of imaging modalities in clinical staging of localized prostatic carcinoma.
Tarcan T; Türkeri L; Biren T; Küllü S; Gürmen N; Akdaş A
Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 9089045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical application of MRI for urological malignancy. 1: Usefulness of various imaging modalities for local staging of prostatic cancer; a comparison between MRI, CT and transrectal ultrasonography].
Nishimura K; Kita Y; Arai Y; Oishi K; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Kakano Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Dec; 34(12):2083-9. PubMed ID: 3071121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography in staging prostate cancer.
Mitterberger M; Pinggera GM; Pallwein L; Gradl J; Frauscher F; Bartsch G; Strasser H; Akkad T; Horninger W
BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17433033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is preoperative transrectal ultrasonography of value in localised prostatic carcinoma? A blind comparative study between preoperative transrectal ultrasonography and the histopathological radical prostatectomy specimen.
Vijverberg PL; Giessen MC; Kurth KH; Dabhoiwala NF; de Reijke TM; van den Tweel JG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 1426295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]