These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8022142)

  • 21. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less.
    Yamamoto T; Ito K; Ohi M; Kubota Y; Suzuki K; Fukabori Y; Kurokawa K; Yamanaka H
    Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 11744475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
    Ekici S; Ozen H; Ağildere M; Ergen A; Ozkardeş H; Ayhan A; Kendi S
    BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 10368199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic testing for prostate cancer detection: less is best.
    Babaian RJ; Dinney CP; Ramirez EI; Evans RB
    Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 7683834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Significance of endorectal nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and transrectal ultrasound diagnosis in local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
    May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
    Urologe A; 2002 Sep; 41(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 12426863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of the inclusion of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in a multivariate analysis to predict clinically unsuspected extraprostatic cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Schnall M; Malkowicz SB; Tomaszewski JE; Schultz D; Wein A
    Cancer; 1995 May; 75(9):2368-72. PubMed ID: 7536124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation.
    Bates TS; Gillatt DA; Cavanagh PM; Speakman M
    Br J Urol; 1997 Jun; 79(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9202562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. T3 prostate cancer: how reliable is clinical staging?
    Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod L
    Semin Urol Oncol; 1997 Nov; 15(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9421446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
    Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
    Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Kim NK; Kim MJ; Yun SH; Sohn SK; Min JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 Jun; 42(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 10378601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Staging of prostatic carcinoma: TRUS prospective study versus endocoil MRI].
    Mearini L; Rosi P; Zucchi A; Mearini E; Vivacqua C; Salomone U; Regi L; Porena M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Dec; 74(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12508760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging in staging of prostate cancer specifically in patients diagnosed with clinically locally advanced tumours by digital rectal examination.
    Xylinas E; Yates DR; Renard-Penna R; Seringe E; Bousquet JC; Comperat E; Bitker MO; Grenier P; Rouprêt M
    World J Urol; 2013 Aug; 31(4):881-6. PubMed ID: 22193518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
    Schröder FH; van der Maas P; Beemsterboer P; Kruger AB; Hoedemaeker R; Rietbergen J; Kranse R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1817-23. PubMed ID: 9839522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
    Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
    J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biopsy-proved prostate cancer in 100 consecutive men with benign digital rectal examination and elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level. Prevalence and pathologic characteristics.
    Guthman DA; Wilson TM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H; Oesterling JE
    Urology; 1993 Aug; 42(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 7690170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison between 2 techniques of screening for prostatic carcinoma. Rectal exploration and transrectal ultrasonography vs. prostate specific antigen].
    Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Mazzotta A; Lombardi C; Santoni R; Cardini S; Zappa M
    Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 7527916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. American Cancer Society--National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Results from multiple examinations using transrectal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, and prostate specific antigen.
    Mettlin C; Murphy GP; Ray P; Shanberg A; Toi A; Chesley A; Babaian R; Badalament R; Kane RA; Lee F
    Cancer; 1993 Feb; 71(3 Suppl):891-8. PubMed ID: 7679042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prostate carcinoma patients upstaged by imaging and treated with irradiation. An outcome-based analysis.
    Pinover WH; Hanlon A; Lee WR; Kaplan EJ; Hanks GE
    Cancer; 1996 Apr; 77(7):1334-41. PubMed ID: 8608512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of local tumour extension in cases of carcinoma of the prostate.
    Wolff JM; Borchers H; Jakse G
    Arch Esp Urol; 1997 Jun; 50(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 9253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.