These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8022594)

  • 1. Effect of fixation disparity on distance binocular visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S; Murgatroyd RN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Apr; 14(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 8022594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fixation disparity and near visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Abd-Manan F; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Jan; 15(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7724221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of induced fixation disparity on binocular visual acuity.
    Jenkins TC; Pickwell LD; Abd-Manan F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 1454366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distance visual acuity and monovision.
    Collins M; Goode A; Brown B
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Sep; 70(9):723-8. PubMed ID: 8233366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular stereo acuity affects monocular three-dimensional shape perception in patients with strabismus.
    Sawamura H; Gillebert CR; Todd JT; Orban GA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1413-1418. PubMed ID: 29306865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of induced blur on visual acuity and stereoacuity.
    Larson WL; Bolduc M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Apr; 68(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 2052285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of induced fixation disparity by negative lenses on the visually evoked potential wave.
    Heravian-Shandiz J; Douthwaite WA; Jenkins TC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Jul; 13(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 8265171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?
    Otto JM; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 246(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 18379816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
    Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
    J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monocular Versus Binocular Calibrations in Evaluating Fixation Disparity With a Video-Based Eye-Tracker.
    Švede A; Treija E; Jaschinski W; Krūmiņa G
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1110-28. PubMed ID: 26562925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relating binocular and monocular vision in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.
    Agrawal R; Conner IP; Odom JV; Schwartz TL; Mendola JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 124(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 16769838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
    Karania R; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and short-term changes in visual function with multifocal soft contact lens wear in young adults.
    Kang P; Wildsoet CF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 26482903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Goss DA; Sobhani M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23808381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular acuity in the presence and absence of fusion.
    Simpson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 May; 69(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 1594201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of differences in binocularity on perceived absolute distance.
    Cruz AA; Fukusima SS; Schor P; Da-Silva JA
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 1989; 22(11):1355-9. PubMed ID: 2638926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual loss during interocular suppression in normal and strabismic subjects.
    Freeman AW; Jolly N
    Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(15):2043-50. PubMed ID: 7941403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional visual outcomes of cataract extraction in monocular versus binocular patients.
    Pomberg ML; Miller KM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 138(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15234291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monocular vernier acuity in normally binocular, monocular, and amblyopic subjects.
    Osuobeni EP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jul; 69(7):550-5. PubMed ID: 1635759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.