These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8022664)
1. Two notes on impossible figures. Molins JV Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):370. PubMed ID: 8022664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Some thoughts on impossible figures. Molins JP Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 1945672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Illusion reversal rate as a function of subjective depth. Borresen CR J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2313278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation. Reichel FD; Todd JT J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):653-64. PubMed ID: 2144578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual-spatial strength in dyslexia: rapid discrimination of impossible figures. von Károlyi C J Learn Disabil; 2001; 34(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 15503582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures? Harris JP Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 7212126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Putting order in the impossible. Kulpa Z Perception; 1987; 16(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 3684482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of visual illusions in a sample of Nigerian children. Akande A Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Feb; 72(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 2038519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Necessary considerations for a theory of form perception: a theoretical and empirical reply to Boselie and Leeuwenberg (1986). Peterson MA; Hochberg J Perception; 1989; 18(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 2771590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An illusory stone pillar seen in the real world. Wilson JA Perception; 1994; 23(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 7971103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ambiguity in 3-D patterns induced by lighting assumptions. Papathomas TV; Gorea A Perception; 1990; 19(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 2102991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similar processing of real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures by men and women. Beckett PA Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2326138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induced movement-in-depth and induced changing-size elicited by a luminous rotating spiral. Reinhardt-Rutland AH Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 1945725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual ambiguity and stability of reversible figures. Riani M; Tuccio MT; Borsellino A; Radilová J; Radil T Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Aug; 63(1):191-205. PubMed ID: 3748731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Benussi effect with rectangles? Deni JR; Brigner WL Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Apr; 80(2):592-4. PubMed ID: 7675598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary depth cues and background pattern in the portrayal of slant. Reinhardt-Rutland AH J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jan; 119(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 1613487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extremal edges: a powerful cue to depth perception and figure-ground organization. Palmer SE; Ghose T Psychol Sci; 2008 Jan; 19(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 18181795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of discontinuities in the perception of subjective figures. Shipley TF; Kellman PJ Percept Psychophys; 1990 Sep; 48(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 2216653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]