These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8022873)
1. "The Bollinger case": a seventy-nine-year-old headline conveys a current medical-ethical dilemma. Friedlander WJ Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1994; 57(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 8022873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is it ethical to provide futile care? Kinlaw K J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Nov; 79(11):839-42. PubMed ID: 2269865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics to axes: a response to dilemmas in the nursery. Diamond JM New Physician; 1978 Jul; 27(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10308499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The dilemma of "medical futility"--a "wisdom model" for decisionmaking. Reitman JS Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(3):231-64. PubMed ID: 9029841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die vs death in the best interests of the infant. Fleischman AR J Perinatol; 1989 Mar; 9(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 2709158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments. Crossley M Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to "Ethics and drug infants" by Michelle Oberman (CQ vol. 6, no. 2). Jain R; Thomasma DC; Ragas R Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1998; 7(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 9523046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent developments in perinatal and neonatal ethics: a European perspective. Seidler E Semin Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 11(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 3616651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. Luce JM West J Med; 1997 Dec; 167(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 9426480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Acting on a living will: a physician's dilemma. Gordon M; Levitt D CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(7):893-5. PubMed ID: 8837536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Michael Martin and Robert Wendland: beyond the vegetative state. Nelson LJ; Cranford RE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):427-53. PubMed ID: 10394762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective treatment decisions and the legal rights of very young infants. Petersen KA Med J Aust; 1994 Mar; 160(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 8133824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When the time for heroics has passed. Massey RU Conn Med; 1997 Dec; 61(12):803-4. PubMed ID: 9465467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Chicago opinion of marginal value. Parnisari EP Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing suffering and ensuring beneficial outcomes for neonates: an ethical perspective. Brodeur D Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11653274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Choices for a child: an ethical and legal analysis of a failed surrogate birth contract. Marshall A Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):275-302. PubMed ID: 11656855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to heal? Time to die? . . . Most certainly, time to speak. Cassady G J Perinatol; 1989 Mar; 9(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 2709157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent as a parent involvement model in the NICU. Luckner KR; Weinfeld IJ Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Caring for newborns: three world views. In Israel, families look to two messengers of God. Eidelman AI Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 3744794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]