BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8022976)

  • 1. New techniques in chest radiography.
    Glazer HS; Muka E; Sagel SS; Jost RG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1994 Jul; 32(4):711-29. PubMed ID: 8022976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K
    Clin Chest Med; 1991 Mar; 12(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 2009743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital radiography of the chest.
    Freedman MT; Artz DS
    Semin Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 32(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9035276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) combined with computed radiography. Preliminary evaluation.
    de Rooy TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman H; Buchmann F
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 8369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-resolution digital imaging with storage phosphors.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Schaetzing R
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 2299699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current status of digital projectional radiography of the chest.
    Aberle DR; Hansell D; Huang HK
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2299698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of AMBER in single- and dual-energy digital imaging: improvement in noise level and display dynamic range.
    de Rooij TP; Oestmann JW; Schultze Kool LJ; Vrooman HA; Prokop M; Schaefer CM
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 8190963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital chest radiography at the University of Chicago: present status and future plans.
    MacMahon H
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7734531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.