BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8023031)

  • 1. Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests.
    Campbell G
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):499-508. PubMed ID: 8023031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric methods for analysing the accuracy of diagnostic tests with multiple readers.
    Kaufmann J; Werner C; Brunner E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Apr; 14(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 15807148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construction of confidence regions in the ROC space after the estimation of the optimal Youden index-based cut-off point.
    Bantis LE; Nakas CT; Reiser B
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):212-23. PubMed ID: 24261514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
    Van Meerhaeghe A
    Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of non-parametric confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Hotilovac L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 18426855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test.
    Choi BC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 148(11):1127-32. PubMed ID: 9850136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semiparametric ROC surfaces for continuous diagnostic tests based on two test measurements.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2370-83. PubMed ID: 19499550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
    Li C; Chen J; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence-value-accuracy plots: a new method for comparing diagnostic tests based on misclassification costs.
    Remaley AT; Sampson ML; DeLeo JM; Remaley NA; Farsi BD; Zweig MH
    Clin Chem; 1999 Jul; 45(7):934-41. PubMed ID: 10388467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
    Qin G; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.
    Gengsheng Qin ; Davis AE; Jing BY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 19654172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Shapiro DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
    Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.