These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8023035)

  • 1. Selection bias in observational and experimental studies.
    Ellenberg JH
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):557-67. PubMed ID: 8023035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of bias in clinical trials.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):595-6. PubMed ID: 21967950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Potkin SG; Siu CO
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Intention-to-treat].
    Faller H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Feb; 43(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 14963806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.
    Ivanova A; Barrier RC; Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1537-46. PubMed ID: 15723426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of sample selection estimators to control for attrition bias.
    Grasdal A
    Health Econ; 2001 Jul; 10(5):385-98. PubMed ID: 11466801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereotyping and the treatment of missing data for drug and alcohol clinical trials.
    Arndt S
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2009 Feb; 4():2. PubMed ID: 19226454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thinking while balancing: what to do about replacing dropouts.
    Shader RI; Harmatz JS; Greenblatt DJ
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1994 Aug; 14(4):229. PubMed ID: 7962677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals.
    Yao F; Singer M; Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 17903567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding and evaluating clinical trials.
    Bigby M; Gadenne AS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1996 Apr; 34(4):555-90; quiz 591-3. PubMed ID: 8601646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trials.
    Signorini DF; Leung O; Simes RJ; Beller E; Gebski VJ; Callaghan T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2343-50. PubMed ID: 8134737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective outcome reporting and sponsorship in randomized controlled trials in IVF and ICSI.
    Braakhekke M; Scholten I; Mol F; Limpens J; Mol BW; van der Veen F
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2117-2122. PubMed ID: 28938740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Williamson PR; Gamble C
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1547-61. PubMed ID: 15580591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of bias assessment of clinical trials published in iberoamerican urological journals.
    García-Perdomo HA; Díaz-Hung AM; Mejía LM
    Arch Esp Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 26331398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang Y; Alyass A; Vanniyasingam T; Sadeghirad B; Flórez ID; Pichika SC; Kennedy SA; Abdulkarimova U; Zhang Y; Iljon T; Morgano GP; Colunga Lozano LE; Aloweni FAB; Lopes LC; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Fei Y; Wang L; Kahale LA; Meyre D; Akl EA; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():67-80. PubMed ID: 28579378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials funded and published by the United Kingdom Health Technology Assessment Programme.
    Walters SJ; Bonacho Dos Anjos Henriques-Cadby I; Bortolami O; Flight L; Hind D; Jacques RM; Knox C; Nadin B; Rothwell J; Surtees M; Julious SA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e015276. PubMed ID: 28320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A graphical assessment of the potential impact of losses to follow-up on the validity of study results. The Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS.
    Matts JP; Launer CA; Nelson ET; Miller C; Dain B
    Stat Med; 1997 Sep; 16(17):1943-54. PubMed ID: 9304765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Describing the participants in a study.
    Pickering RM
    Age Ageing; 2017 Jul; 46(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28472376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of randomized controlled trials published in the US family medicine literature, 1987-1991.
    Silagy CA; Jewell D; Mant D
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Sep; 39(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 8077902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.