These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8023035)

  • 21. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Catalogue of bias: attrition bias.
    Nunan D; Aronson J; Bankhead C
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Feb; 23(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 29367321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang Y; Flórez ID; Colunga Lozano LE; Aloweni FAB; Kennedy SA; Li A; Craigie S; Zhang S; Agarwal A; Lopes LC; Devji T; Wiercioch W; Riva JJ; Wang M; Jin X; Fei Y; Alexander P; Morgano GP; Zhang Y; Carrasco-Labra A; Kahale LA; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():57-66. PubMed ID: 28583378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How can good randomized controlled trials in leading journals be so misinterpreted?
    Veith FJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 57(2 Suppl):3S-7S. PubMed ID: 23336854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Shah ND; O'Donnell M; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(7):748-759. PubMed ID: 28241362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):920-7. PubMed ID: 22996110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ignorability and bias in clinical trials.
    Heitjan DF
    Stat Med; 1999 Sep 15-30; 18(17-18):2421-34. PubMed ID: 10474150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methods for the analysis of binary outcome results in the presence of missing data.
    Delucchi KL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Jun; 62(3):569-75. PubMed ID: 8063983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why olanzapine beats risperidone, risperidone beats quetiapine, and quetiapine beats olanzapine: an exploratory analysis of head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics.
    Heres S; Davis J; Maino K; Jetzinger E; Kissling W; Leucht S
    Am J Psychiatry; 2006 Feb; 163(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 16449469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bias in clinical intervention research.
    Gluud LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 16443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward.
    Schulz KF; Grimes DA
    Lancet; 2002 Mar; 359(9308):781-5. PubMed ID: 11888606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Publication bias of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine.
    Ospina MB; Kelly K; Klassen TP; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 13(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 16365332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of community intervention trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2615-28. PubMed ID: 17068842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The case against independent monitoring committees.
    Harrington D; Crowley J; George SL; Pajak T; Redmond C; Wieand S
    Stat Med; 1994 Jul 15-30; 13(13-14):1411-4. PubMed ID: 7973220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.
    Mansournia MA; Higgins JP; Sterne JA; Hernán MA
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 27748683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does analysis using "last observation carried forward" introduce bias in dementia research?
    Molnar FJ; Hutton B; Fergusson D
    CMAJ; 2008 Oct; 179(8):751-3. PubMed ID: 18838445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dropouts and sub-groups--statistics can help but not cure.
    Croft P; Froud R; Lewis AM
    Pain; 2010 Dec; 151(3):563-564. PubMed ID: 20832943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attrition in randomized controlled clinical trials: methodological issues in psychopharmacology.
    Leon AC; Mallinckrodt CH; Chuang-Stein C; Archibald DG; Archer GE; Chartier K
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):1001-5. PubMed ID: 16503329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.