BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8023036)

  • 1. Evaluating cancer screening programs using survival analysis.
    Vratanar B; Pohar Perme M
    Biom J; 2023 Oct; 65(7):e2200344. PubMed ID: 37278228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of Lead Time via Low-Dose CT in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Liu R; PĂ©rez A; Wu D
    J Healthc Inform Res; 2018 Dec; 2(4):353-366. PubMed ID: 35415415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optimal starting age of endoscopic screening for esophageal squamous cell cancer in high prevalence areas in China.
    Feng H; Song G; Ma S; Ma Q; Li X; Wei W; Abnet C; Qiao Y; Wang G
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1761-1768. PubMed ID: 32367575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian lead time estimation for the Johns Hopkins Lung Project data.
    Jang H; Kim S; Wu D
    J Epidemiol Glob Health; 2013 Sep; 3(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 23932058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian inference for the lead time in periodic cancer screening.
    Wu D; Rosner GL; Broemeling LD
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 17825017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chest X-ray screening improves outcome in lung cancer. A reappraisal of randomized trials on lung cancer screening.
    Strauss GM; Gleason RE; Sugarbaker DJ
    Chest; 1995 Jun; 107(6 Suppl):270S-279S. PubMed ID: 7781405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of length biased sampling of unobserved sojourn times on the survival distribution when disease is screen detected.
    Kafadar K; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2116-46. PubMed ID: 19424959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative definitions of comparable case groups and estimates of lead time and benefit time in randomized cancer screening trials.
    Kafadar K; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):83-111. PubMed ID: 12486753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.
    Weiss NS; Koepsell TD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):864-5; author reply 865-6. PubMed ID: 12048281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.
    Begg CB; Bach PB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):863-4; author reply 865-6. PubMed ID: 12048279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up.
    Marcus PM; Bergstralh EJ; Fagerstrom RM; Williams DE; Fontana R; Taylor WF; Prorok PC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Aug; 92(16):1308-16. PubMed ID: 10944552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A data-analytic approach for estimating lead time and screening benefit based on survival curves in randomized cancer screening trials.
    Kafadar K; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):569-86. PubMed ID: 8023036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view.
    Strauss GM; Gleason RE; Sugarbaker DJ
    Chest; 1997 Mar; 111(3):754-68. PubMed ID: 9118717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.