These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8026933)

  • 1. Grandma? No, I'm the mother!
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 8026933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy.
    Stephenson PA; Wagner MG
    J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International human rights and women's reproductive health.
    Cook RJ
    Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8511808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The exclusion of pregnant, pregnable, and once-pregnable people (a.k.a. women) from biomedical research.
    Merton V
    Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(4):369-451. PubMed ID: 7942864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond Baby M: international perspectives on gestational surrogacy and the demise of the unitary biological mother.
    Krim TM
    Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):193-226. PubMed ID: 10184657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
    Taylor KA
    Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
    Hyams R
    E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Rights and protection of the pregnant woman today in France].
    Ponte C
    Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2006 Dec; (233):23-6. PubMed ID: 17236378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The framing on human stem cells research under the screen of French Parliament].
    de Boischevalier B
    Med Sci (Paris); 2007 Feb; 23(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 17291435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements.
    Gostin L
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice and the post-Roe generation.
    Morse J
    Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 12577596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human rights and reproductive choice.
    Freedman LP; Isaacs SL
    Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 8475521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New reproductive technologies and legal reform.
    Roach SL
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(1):11-27. PubMed ID: 11650410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Of ice and men: the big chill over women's reproductive rights.
    Raymond JG
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11649281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex & gender: the politics, policy, and practice of medical research.
    Keitt SK
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2003; 3(2):253-78. PubMed ID: 14577143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legislating surrogacy: a partial answer to feminist criticism.
    Brandel A
    MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):488-527. PubMed ID: 11653264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.