These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8028655)

  • 1. Peer review: NIH urged to streamline bids..
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6486):170-1. PubMed ID: 8028655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review. NIH urged to focus on new ideas, new applicants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5867):1169. PubMed ID: 18309051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH needs a makeover.
    Dey SK
    Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Looking to NSF as an NIH model.
    Yost WA
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6046):1093. PubMed ID: 21868657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH: gearing up for the twenty-first century.
    Baldwin W; McCardle P
    Physiologist; 1997 Jun; 40(3):89, 91-3. PubMed ID: 9230629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On incentives for innovation.
    Alberts B
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1163. PubMed ID: 19965437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Varmus speaks out on need to boost clinical research.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6502):118. PubMed ID: 7969431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MRC commitments.
    Harvey SC
    Science; 1998 Feb; 279(5353):967-8. PubMed ID: 9490479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
    Hegde D; Mowery DC
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.