These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8029069)

  • 21. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No good news from the United Kingdom.
    Clinton M
    Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs; 1996 Jun; 5(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 9079296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pay and conditions: the state of the nursing nation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):18. PubMed ID: 1450020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The case to answer. Pay review body evidence.
    Carlisle D
    Nurs Times; 1994 Sep 28-Oct 4; 90(39):18-9. PubMed ID: 7971340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No more waiting!
    Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Nov; 153(20):18. PubMed ID: 6915519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Money talks.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(21):13. PubMed ID: 2494550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence to the Review Body.
    Clay T
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 1. PubMed ID: 6569339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. True worth.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Dec; (427):3. PubMed ID: 3853100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The writing is on the wall.
    Cole A
    Nurs Times; 1987 Dec 16-29; 83(50):18. PubMed ID: 3432068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Royal College of Nursing. Leading Role. Uniform approach.
    Clay T
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Jul; (405):4. PubMed ID: 3848693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A national perspective.
    Hancock C
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Sep; 10(50):20. PubMed ID: 8868902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pay campaign. Working to rules.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 Apr 12-18; 91(15):18. PubMed ID: 7731836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pay campaign. Striking precedents.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1995 Mar 22-8; 91(12):20-1. PubMed ID: 7716032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical grading: can it succeed?
    Horne EM
    Prof Nurse; 1988 Sep; 3(12):481. PubMed ID: 3413145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pay award. Relief--and concern.
    Naish J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Feb; 3(22):14-5. PubMed ID: 2495458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The PRB has done nurses proud in 1985.
    Osborne R
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Jun; (402):5. PubMed ID: 3847792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pay. In and out of pocket.
    Leifer D; Scott G
    Nurs Stand; 1995 May 31-Jun 6; 9(36):21. PubMed ID: 7612439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speakman on top nurses' pay. Why aren't equal salaries proposed.
    Hancock C
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jul; 149(2):6. PubMed ID: 257582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reasons for rocking the boat.
    Bolger T; Fogg D
    Nurs Times; 1979 Jul; 75(26):1122-3. PubMed ID: 257416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.