These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols. Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing. Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols. Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Awai K; Takada K; Onishi H; Hori S Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 12202710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus. Kopka L; Funke M; Vosshenrich R; Hagemann A; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 7790550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material. Brink JA; Heiken JP; Forman HP; Sagel SS; Molina PL; Brown PC Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Fleischmann D; Rubin GD; Bankier AA; Hittmair K Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 10671582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT]. Erdoğan C; Savci G Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Awai K; Hiraishi K; Hori S Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 14695390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pancreas: patient body weight tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT. Yanaga Y; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Nakaura T; Tamura Y; Hatemura M; Yamashita Y Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17890356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hepatic helical CT: effect of reduction of iodine dose of intravenous contrast material on hepatic contrast enhancement. Freeny PC; Gardner JC; vonIngersleben G; Heyano S; Nghiem HV; Winter TC Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 7568860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients. Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):518-22. PubMed ID: 7972771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of rate of contrast medium injection on hepatic enhancement at CT. Garcia PA; Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Liang L; Reinhold C; Atri M Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 8633144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]