These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8029412)
1. Focal areas of increased opacity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the comedo type: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Kinkel K; Gilles R; Féger C; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Masselot J; Vanel D Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 8029412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype. Stomper PC; Connolly JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Holland R; Hendriks JH Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic significance of calcifications in the mammogram]. Menges V Z Lymphol; 1981 Jul; 5(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 6270925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection. Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography. Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digitization of microcalcifications in breast radiographs. Correlation with pathologic data. Charpin C; Allasia C; Davies JD; Devictor B; Boulat J; Ansaldi JL; Lavaut MN; Serradour B; Andrac L; Piana L Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 8526947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast specimen microcalcifications: radiographic validation and pathologic-radiologic correlation. D'Orsi CJ; Reale FR; Davis MA; Brown VJ Radiology; 1991 Aug; 180(2):397-401. PubMed ID: 1648756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonpalpable ductal carcinoma in situ versus infiltrating carcinoma of the breast--can they be differentiated by mammography? Hermann G; Keller RJ; Halton K; Schwartz I; Rabinowitz JG; Tartter P Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Jun; 42(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 1647259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast. Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Stomper PC; Connolly JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 1309620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New insights into mammographic correlations in breast pathology. Troupin RH; Orel SG Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):593-601. PubMed ID: 1653588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]