254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8029542)
1. [Deafness in children: new modalities of neonatal screening].
Gavilan Cellie I
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1993; 114(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8029542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
Mathur NN; Dhawan R
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of 10 years of deafness screening and diagnosis in children and its implications. Early education of the young deaf child].
Poncet E; Chaperon C; Metreau M; François M; Receveur M; Roulleau P
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1983; 100(8):543-8. PubMed ID: 6670806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Universal hearing screening in the Champagne-Ardenne regions: results and consideration after 55 000 births from January 2004 to June 2007].
Langagne T; Schmidt P; Leveque M; Chays A
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2008; 129(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19694157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss. Use of oto-acoustic emission tests in newborn infants with increased risk of hearing impairment].
Størdal K; Anderssen SH; Lunde JT; Andersen R; Sponheim L
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Oct; 118(26):4076-8. PubMed ID: 9844511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Neonatal hearing screening].
Oudesluys-Murphy AM; van Straaten HL; Ens-Dokkum MH; Kauffman-de Boer MA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Mar; 144(13):594-8. PubMed ID: 10761545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases.
Uus K; Bamford J
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e887-93. PubMed ID: 16651292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
Xu FL; Xing QJ; Cheng XY
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Further examination of infants referred from newborn hearing screening.
Wada T; Kubo T; Aiba T; Yamane H
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 Oct; (554):17-25. PubMed ID: 15513505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Early detection of hearing loss in neonates by using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Trinidad Ramos G; Pando Pinto J; Vega Cuadri A; Serrano Berrocal M; Trinidad Ruiz G; Blasco Huelva A
An Esp Pediatr; 1999 Feb; 50(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 10199028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of hearing loss in the neonatal intensive care unit population.
Dennis JM; Sheldon R; Toubas P; McCaffee MA
Am J Otol; 1984 Jan; 5(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 6720873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of the hearing impaired infant.
Sirimanna KS
Semin Neonatol; 2001 Dec; 6(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 12014892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Systematic hearing screening for newborns in the Champagne-Ardennes region: 32,500 births in 2 years of experience].
Schmidt P; Leveque M; Danvin JB; Leroux B; Chays A
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2007 Sep; 124(4):157-65. PubMed ID: 17669353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Wroblewska-Seniuk K; Chojnacka K; Pucher B; Szczapa J; Gadzinowski J; Grzegorowski M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Oct; 69(10):1351-7. PubMed ID: 15904979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing screening of neonates at risk.
Maisoun AM; Zakzouk SM
Saudi Med J; 2003 Jan; 24(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12590276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying congenital hearing impairment. Personal experience based on selective hearing screening.
Molini E; Ricci G; Baroni S; Ciorba A; Bellocci A; Simoncelli C
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2004 Jun; 24(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 15584580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Screening of deafness in the young child. Value, techniques and initial results of products of acoustic distortion].
Bonfils P; Avan P; François M; Loundon N; Elbez M; Trotoux J; Narcy P
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1993; 110(1):3-8; discussion 8-9. PubMed ID: 8317861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
