These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 802981)

  • 21. [The role of laryngeal kinesthetic feedback in the control of pitch in speech production].
    Duflo S; Ouaknine M; Ghio A; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 20387375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Did you or I say pretty, rude or brief? An ERP study of the effects of speaker's identity on emotional word processing.
    Pinheiro AP; Rezaii N; Nestor PG; Rauber A; Spencer KM; Niznikiewicz M
    Brain Lang; 2016 Feb; 153-154():38-49. PubMed ID: 26894680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex.
    Belin P; Zatorre RJ; Lafaille P; Ahad P; Pike B
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6767):309-12. PubMed ID: 10659849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The power of your vocal image.
    McCoy LA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1996 Mar; 62(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 8868166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Motor-Learning-Based Adjustment of Ambulatory Feedback on Vocal Loudness for Patients With Parkinson's Disease.
    Gustafsson J; Ternström S; Södersten M; Schalling E
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 26168903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benefits of the fiber optic versus the electret microphone in voice amplification.
    Kyriakou K; Fisher HR
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013 Jan; 48(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 23317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech.
    Chen SH; Liu H; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1157-63. PubMed ID: 17348536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory response following vocalization: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Gunji A; Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Mar; 112(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 11222973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speaker's voice as a memory cue.
    Campeanu S; Craik FI; Alain C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 25173195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Unexpected intensity changes in the ear canal during a F(0)-shifted feedback experiment.
    Tlumak AI; Szuminsky NJ; Shaiman S; Pratt SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL413-9. PubMed ID: 24181984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Loud Voice and Clear Speech on the Use of Vocal Fry in Women.
    Behrman A; Akhund A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(4):159-166. PubMed ID: 28118633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: the role of auditory feedback.
    Jones JA; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):532-43. PubMed ID: 12558289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inhibiting the Lombard effect.
    Pick HL; Siegel GM; Fox PW; Garber SR; Kearney JK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Feb; 85(2):894-900. PubMed ID: 2926004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Occlusion effect on compensatory formant production and voice amplitude in response to real-time perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4017. PubMed ID: 28040002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A "voice inversion effect?".
    Bédard C; Belin P
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):247-9. PubMed ID: 15177788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.