123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8029822)
1. U.S. Supreme Court decision of N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
Pendergast J; Wagner B
Stat; 1994 Jul; 63(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 8029822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. Supreme Court decision: six months later.
Ohio Nurses Rev; 1995; 70(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 7877789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America, Inc.: a challenge for the nursing profession.
Smith MH
Nurs Outlook; 1996; 44(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 8872001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.
Cornu-Quinn C
Am Nurse; 1994; 26(7):5, 28. PubMed ID: 8067641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Employers use Supreme Court decision against RNs; ANA devises legal, legislative strategies.
Ketter J
Am Nurse; 1994 Oct; 26(9):1, 7. PubMed ID: 7985865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court rules NLRB erred re "supervisory nurses".
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):1. PubMed ID: 8066179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
Oreg Nurse; 1994 Dec; 59(4):suppl E1. PubMed ID: 7724201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hang on to your rights when faced with a sell-off.
Buswell C
Nurs Times; 2000 Jul; 96(30 Suppl):11-2. PubMed ID: 11963428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurses 'disturbed' by new regulations.
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Mar; 58(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 2710464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. Supreme Court reviews tests for determining when a nurse is a supervisor. NLRB v. Health Care and Retirement Corporation of America.
Hershey N
Hosp Law Newsl; 1995 Mar; 12(5):5-7. PubMed ID: 10184289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal obligations of nurses an R.N- lawyer analyzes ethical dilemma.
Greenlaw J
Todays Nurs Home; 1980; 1(3):8-9, 12-6. PubMed ID: 10248786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. PA: Was LPN fired or did she quit?: LPN quit!--unemployment benefits denied!
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):3. PubMed ID: 15754901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Failing to chart can cost you your job! Case in point: Alexander v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources (484 So. 2d 722-LA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 May; 26(12):4. PubMed ID: 3636939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal case briefs for nurses. MT: license denied: "reciprocity" issue; ND: National Guard nurse: discrimination.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Apr; 26(11):3. PubMed ID: 3635148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MN:LPN fired for yelling obscenities at pt., etc.: unemployment benefits denied--firing for cause.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Nov; 46(6):3. PubMed ID: 16372746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The reference you give may come back to bite you. Case on point: Kevorkian v. Glass, 913 a.2d 1043 -RI (2007).
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Jun; 48(1):4. PubMed ID: 17703719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court decision threatens patient advocacy.
Fulwider K
Mo Nurse; 1994; 63(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 8084329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court strikes down National Labor Relations Board's restrictive definition of health care supervisor. N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
Stephens DJ
Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Sep; 9(9):9-12. PubMed ID: 10184182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The third age. Documentation for the RCI.
Hurst C
Aust Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 21(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 1958150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
