200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8031686)
21. Impact of a new clinical mattress solution on interface pressure and comfort during supine lying.
Webb JA; Chohan A
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(8):513-518. PubMed ID: 37572343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interface pressure comparison of healthy premature infants with various neonatal bed surfaces.
Turnage-Carrier C; McLane KM; Gregurich MA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2008 Jun; 8(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 18535423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A quantitative analysis of pressure and shear in the effectiveness of support surfaces.
Fontaine R; Risley S; Castellino R
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1998 Sep; 25(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 9923257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effectiveness of three types of alternating pressure air mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers in Belgian hospitals.
Demarré L; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Grypdonck M; Clays E; Vanderwee K; Beeckman D
Res Nurs Health; 2013 Oct; 36(5):439-52. PubMed ID: 23907784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement over the sacrum on various anti-decubitus mattresses.
Jakobsen J; Christensen KS
Dan Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 34(6):330-1. PubMed ID: 3436160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skin blood flow in relation to external pressure and temperature in the supine position on a standard hospital mattress.
Ek AC; Gustavsson G; Lewis DH
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1987; 19(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 3441774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR
J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses.
Bergstrand S; Källman U; Ek AC; Engström M; Lindgren M
J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):346-58. PubMed ID: 26562377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of contact pressures measured at the sacrum of young and elderly subjects.
Clark M; Rowland LB
J Biomed Eng; 1989 May; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2724940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Alternating pressure air mattresses as prevention for pressure ulcers: a literature review.
Vanderwee K; Grypdonck M; Defloor T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 May; 45(5):784-801. PubMed ID: 17919638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing the effects of 3 different pressure ulcer prevention support surfaces on the structure and function of heel and sacral skin: An exploratory cross-over trial.
Tomova-Simitchieva T; Lichterfeld-Kottner A; Blume-Peytavi U; Kottner J
Int Wound J; 2018 Jun; 15(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 29277963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of two pressure-relieving devices on the prevention of heel pressure ulcers.
Tymec AC; Pieper B; Vollman K
Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9204803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laboratory performance of alternating pressure air mattresses component and sequelae.
Bain D
Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S29-34. PubMed ID: 22067933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oxy-Mat™ Mattress System Development Utilizing Simultaneous Measurement of Interface Pressure and Deep Tissue Oxygen Saturation.
Butler GJ; Kenyon DJ; Gorenstein S; Davenport T; Golembe E; Lee B; Vieweg J
Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():71-82. PubMed ID: 26054994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Alternating pressure mattresses: comfort and quality of sleep.
Grindley A; Acres J
Br J Nurs; 1996 Nov 28-Dec 11; 5(21):1303-10. PubMed ID: 9015985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat.
Patel UH; Jones JT; Babbs CF; Bourland JD; Graber GP
Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 8347281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Using an indentation measurement device to assess foam mattress quality.
Heule EJ; Goossens RH; Mugge R; Dietz E; Heule F
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Nov; 53(11):56-62. PubMed ID: 18057447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
