These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8032139)

  • 1. Mutation load depending on variance in reproductive success and mating system.
    Couvet D; Ronfort J
    EXS; 1994; 68():55-68. PubMed ID: 8032139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation.
    Schultz ST; Willis JH
    Genetics; 1995 Nov; 141(3):1209-23. PubMed ID: 8582625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A metapopulation perspective on genetic diversity and differentiation in partially self-fertilizing plants.
    Ingvarsson PK
    Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2368-73. PubMed ID: 12583577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems.
    Fishman L
    Heredity (Edinb); 2001 Feb; 86(Pt 2):184-94. PubMed ID: 11380664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations.
    Charlesworth B; Charlesworth D
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 9720268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling problems in conservation genetics using Drosophila: consequences of fluctuating population sizes.
    Woodworth LM; Montgomery ME; Nurthen RK; Briscoe DA; Frankham R
    Mol Ecol; 1994 Aug; 3(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 7921363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A threefold genetic allee effect: population size affects cross-compatibility, inbreeding depression and drift load in the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans.
    Willi Y; Van Buskirk J; Fischer M
    Genetics; 2005 Apr; 169(4):2255-65. PubMed ID: 15695366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate.
    Wang J; Hill WG; Charlesworth D; Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1999 Oct; 74(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 10584559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mating structure and the cost of deleterious mutation: I. Postponing inbreeding.
    Campbell RB
    J Hered; 1988; 79(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 3392389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deleterious Variation in Natural Populations and Implications for Conservation Genetics.
    Robinson J; Kyriazis CC; Yuan SC; Lohmueller KE
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2023 Feb; 11():93-114. PubMed ID: 36332644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex-biased inbreeding effects on reproductive success and home range size of the critically endangered black rhinoceros.
    Cain B; Wandera AB; Shawcross SG; Edwin Harris W; Stevens-Wood B; Kemp SJ; Okita-Ouma B; Watts PC
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):594-603. PubMed ID: 24641512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The genetic consequences of fluctuating inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant selfing rates.
    Porcher E; Kelly JK; Cheptou PO; Eckert CG; Johnston MO; Kalisz S
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):708-17. PubMed ID: 19228271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relaxation of selection with equalization of parental contributions in conservation programs: an experimental test with Drosophila melanogaster.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Morán P; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1043-54. PubMed ID: 16299385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microsatellite variation and evolution in the Mimulus guttatus species complex with contrasting mating systems.
    Awadalla P; Ritland K
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Oct; 14(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 9335142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mutational load, inbreeding depression and heterosis in subdivided populations.
    Charlesworth B
    Mol Ecol; 2018 Dec; 27(24):4991-5003. PubMed ID: 30415505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load.
    Barrett SC; Charlesworth D
    Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6335):522-4. PubMed ID: 1865906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems.
    Kelly JK
    New Phytol; 2005 Jan; 165(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15720620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consequences of life history for inbreeding depression and mating system evolution in plants.
    Morgan MT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 268(1478):1817-24. PubMed ID: 11522201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferences on genome-wide deleterious mutation rates in inbred populations of Drosophila and mice.
    Caballero A; Keightley PD
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):229-39. PubMed ID: 9720282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.