197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8032408)
1. Automatic karyotype analysis.
Graham J; Piper J
Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PIXEL SENSIBLE LOCAL BAND ANALYSIS IN MICROSCOPIC CHROMOSOME IMAGES USING CSPA.
Somasundaram D
Tsitol Genet; 2016; 50(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 27266185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH
Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Multicolor spectral karyotyping (SKY) and its application to the cytogenetic diagnosis of multiple myeloma].
Cigudosa JC; Calasanz MJ; García Miranda JL
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Aug; 44(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 10589283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT
Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase.
Jagielski J; Haus O
Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Studies of differentially stained metaphase chromosomes using scanning systems and computer technics].
Saralidze EG; Ul'ianov NB; Kaminir LB
Tsitologiia; 1983 Mar; 25(3):235-49. PubMed ID: 6344370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Chromosome analysis using image processing. Recent aspects and perspectives].
Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Grouche L; Perissel B
Ann Genet; 1989; 32(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2683979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a multicolor chromosome bar code for the entire human karyotype by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Müller S; Rocchi M; Ferguson-Smith MA; Wienberg J
Hum Genet; 1997 Aug; 100(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 9254863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in Q-band prometaphase images.
Grisan E; Poletti E; Ruggeri A
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 19193514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH.
Speicher MR; Gwyn Ballard S; Ward DC
Nat Genet; 1996 Apr; 12(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 8630489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic analysis of chromosomes. The use of reduced numerical patterns for computer karyotyping of chromosomes.
Jagielski J; Noga L; Haus O
Acta Med Pol; 1982; 23(3-4):183-91. PubMed ID: 7187607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Aspects of automated chromosome analysis. Different representations of banded human chromosomes and their cytogenetic evaluation.
Lundsteen C
Dan Med Bull; 1980 Feb; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6156802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chromosome banding and identification absorption staining.
Sumner AT
Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():59-81. PubMed ID: 7518287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping.
Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
