These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8032408)

  • 1. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PIXEL SENSIBLE LOCAL BAND ANALYSIS IN MICROSCOPIC CHROMOSOME IMAGES USING CSPA.
    Somasundaram D
    Tsitol Genet; 2016; 50(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 27266185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Multicolor spectral karyotyping (SKY) and its application to the cytogenetic diagnosis of multiple myeloma].
    Cigudosa JC; Calasanz MJ; García Miranda JL
    Sangre (Barc); 1999 Aug; 44(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 10589283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase.
    Jagielski J; Haus O
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Studies of differentially stained metaphase chromosomes using scanning systems and computer technics].
    Saralidze EG; Ul'ianov NB; Kaminir LB
    Tsitologiia; 1983 Mar; 25(3):235-49. PubMed ID: 6344370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Chromosome analysis using image processing. Recent aspects and perspectives].
    Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Grouche L; Perissel B
    Ann Genet; 1989; 32(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2683979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward a multicolor chromosome bar code for the entire human karyotype by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Müller S; Rocchi M; Ferguson-Smith MA; Wienberg J
    Hum Genet; 1997 Aug; 100(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 9254863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic segmentation and disentangling of chromosomes in Q-band prometaphase images.
    Grisan E; Poletti E; Ruggeri A
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jul; 13(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 19193514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH.
    Speicher MR; Gwyn Ballard S; Ward DC
    Nat Genet; 1996 Apr; 12(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 8630489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic analysis of chromosomes. The use of reduced numerical patterns for computer karyotyping of chromosomes.
    Jagielski J; Noga L; Haus O
    Acta Med Pol; 1982; 23(3-4):183-91. PubMed ID: 7187607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aspects of automated chromosome analysis. Different representations of banded human chromosomes and their cytogenetic evaluation.
    Lundsteen C
    Dan Med Bull; 1980 Feb; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6156802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
    Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
    Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chromosome banding and identification absorption staining.
    Sumner AT
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():59-81. PubMed ID: 7518287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping.
    Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.