171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8032512)
1. Can complex legislation solve our end-of-life problems?
Minogue B; Reagan JE
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 8032512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) and the incapacitated patient: policy suggestions for healthcare ethics committees.
Drane JF
HEC Forum; 1991; 3(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 10116447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Justice within intimate spheres.
Carse AL
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 8490226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The case of the coercive family.
Marshall PA; Hartz J; Tan SY
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):135-6; discussion 136-42. PubMed ID: 8032514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
Gramelspacher GP
Indiana Med; 1992; 85(3):218-21. PubMed ID: 1602123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Acceptance and validation of advanced directives--ethical and clinical considerations].
Sass HM; Kielstein R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(6):121-4. PubMed ID: 9214147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A womb of my own: a moral evaluation of Ohio's treatment of pregnant patients with living wills.
Lederman AD
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1994; 45(1):351-77. PubMed ID: 11656507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Patient Self-Determination Act. On balance, more help than hindrance.
White ML; Fletcher JC
JAMA; 1991 Jul; 266(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 2056653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. To treat or not to treat: end-of-life care, patient autonomy, and the responsible practice of medicine.
Fontugne EA
J Leg Med; 2014; 35(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 25517633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient rights and dying: policy restraint and the states.
Keigher SM
Health Soc Work; 1994 Nov; 19(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 7813969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dying by the rules. Legal decisions at the end of life.
Burke FA
N C Med J; 1996; 57(6):386-9. PubMed ID: 8937166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal and ethical issues associated with Advance Care Directives in an Australian context.
Denniss DL
Intern Med J; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1375-1380. PubMed ID: 27981764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advance directives: the United States experience.
Cranford RE
Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The benefits of a North Carolina policy for determining inappropriate or futile medical care.
Kopelman AE; Parker JC; Ho G; Willson CF; Kopelman LM
N C Med J; 2005; 66(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 16323592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The campaign to deny terminally ill patients information and choices at the end of life.
Tucker KL
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):495-514. PubMed ID: 19953404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.
Dewar MA
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8133230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Choices: the ethics of dying pose new challenges for caregivers.
Buss DD
Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Mar; 17(3):40-1, 43, 45-7. PubMed ID: 10132980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of advance directives. For physicians, a legal dilemma becomes an ethical imperative.
McIntyre KM
Arch Intern Med; 1992 May; 152(5):925-9. PubMed ID: 1580717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Patient autonomy at the end of life: "law regarding advance directives" confirms the previously assumed legal status].
Schell W
Kinderkrankenschwester; 2009 Sep; 28(9):368-9. PubMed ID: 19795683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
