These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8032516)
1. A critique of traditional relationship models. Loewy RS Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8032516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The changing doctor-patient relationship and the new medical ethics. Benatar SR SA J Contin Med Educ; 1987 Apr; 5(4):27, 29, 32-34. PubMed ID: 11649937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Models of the doctor-patient relationship and the ethics committee: Part One. Thomasma DC Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(1):11-31. PubMed ID: 1342845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ethics of surreptitious diagnostics for factitious hypoglycemia. Braithwaite SS; Eatherton JK; Ellos WJ; Emanuele MA; Morrissey M; Sizemore GW J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):116-21; discussion 121-2. PubMed ID: 2131069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Respect for autonomy and medical paternalism reconsidered. McCullough LB; Wear S Theor Med; 1985 Oct; 6(3):295-308. PubMed ID: 4060091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Models of the doctor-patient relationship and the ethics committee: Part two. Thomasma DC Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 8032510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient and physician autonomy: conflicting rights and obligations in the physician-patient relationship. Pellegrino ED J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():47-68. PubMed ID: 10134815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient interests: clinical implications of philosophical distinctions. Wikler D J Am Geriatr Soc; 1988 Oct; 36(10):951-8. PubMed ID: 3171032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent: rethinking the connections. II. Shatz D Cancer Invest; 1986; 4(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 3768761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The physician-patient relationship: models and criticisms. Brody H Theor Med; 1987 Jun; 8(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 3660283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz. Pellegrino ED St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On lying and deceiving. Bakhurst D J Med Ethics; 1992 Jun; 18(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 1619626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Freedom and democracy in health care ethics: is the cart before the horse? Meaney ME Theor Med; 1996 Dec; 17(4):399-414. PubMed ID: 9001131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship of autonomy and integrity in medical ethics. Pellegrino ED Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1990; 24(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 2073550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paternalism and medical ethics. Gillon R Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6486):1971-2. PubMed ID: 3924330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution. Pellegrino ED; Thomasma DC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():23-46. PubMed ID: 11645600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Discretionary power, lies, and broken trust: justification and discomfort. Potter N Theor Med; 1996 Dec; 17(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 9001127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical considerations of informed consent: a case study. Goldfield N; Rothman WA Soc Sci Med; 1987; 24(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 3035724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voices from the silent world of doctor and patient. Starr J; Zawacki BE Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999; 8(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 10067184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The irreducibly clinical character of bioethics. Wear S J Med Philos; 1991 Feb; 16(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 2010721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]