These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8035690)
1. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking. Jordan TR; Bevan KM Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect. Jordan TR; Patching GR Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geometric and semantic similarity in visual masking. Jacobson JZ; Rhinelander G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 660097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope. Prinzmetal W Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A note on the masking of pictures. Forster PM Perception; 1982; 11(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 7167340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Word length and visual-noise texture in backward masking. Zamansky HS; Corwin TR Perception; 1976; 5(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 951170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue. Solman RT Perception; 1982; 11(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 7167339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task. Jacobs AM; Grainger J Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 2011452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What's in a mask? Information masking with forward and backward visual masks. Davis C; Kim J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1990-2002. PubMed ID: 21790494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Figural relationship effects and mechanisms of visual masking. Hellige JB; Walsh DA; Lawrence VW; Prasse M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 528933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect. Solman RT Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception and masking of wholes and parts. McClelland JL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 May; 4(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 660096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dichoptic backward masking of letters, words, and trigrams in old and young subjects. Cramer G; Kietzman ML; van Laer J Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 7128655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking. Fine EM Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):831-8. PubMed ID: 11763257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Backward contralateral masking by light and by random pattern. Jarvis B; Vormbrock J; Saccuzzo DP Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Aug; 57(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6622151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The word superiority effect overcomes crowding. Cutler J; Bodet A; Rivest J; Cavanagh P Vision Res; 2024 Sep; 222():108436. PubMed ID: 38820621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]