These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8035694)

  • 1. What effect can rhythmic finger tapping have on the phonological similarity effect?
    Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 8035694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of articulatory suppression and memory updating on phonological similarity effect].
    Saito S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Oct; 64(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8301894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonological similarity effect is abolished by a silent mouthing task.
    Saito S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 8483651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slowing fastest finger movements of the dominant hand with low-frequency rTMS of the hand area of the primary motor cortex.
    Jäncke L; Steinmetz H; Benilow S; Ziemann U
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 155(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 14648014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective interference with verbal short-term memory for serial order information: a new paradigm and tests of a timing-signal hypothesis.
    Henson R; Hartley T; Burgess N; Hitch G; Flude B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1307-34. PubMed ID: 14578087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonological similarity in working memory.
    Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):774-6. PubMed ID: 11531232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The phonological similarity effect in short-term memory serial recall in schizophrenia.
    Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Goldberg TE
    Psychiatry Res; 2002 Sep; 112(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12379453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual effects on force control and timing in a finger-tapping sequence with an accentuated- or attenuated-force tap.
    Inui N
    Motor Control; 2004 Jul; 8(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 15322307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of standing and sitting on finger-tapping speed in healthy adults.
    Gabbard C; Hart S
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2002 Oct; 32(10):525-9. PubMed ID: 12403204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bimanual tapping of a syncopated rhythm reveals hemispheric preferences for relative movement frequencies.
    Pflug A; Gompf F; Kell CA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():287-296. PubMed ID: 28605695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finger tapping, handedness and grey matter amount in the Rolando's genu area.
    Hervé PY; Mazoyer B; Crivello F; Perchey G; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 25(4):1133-45. PubMed ID: 15850731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory.
    Boyle R; Coltheart V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 May; 49(2):398-416. PubMed ID: 8685391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language.
    Wilson M; Emmorey K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 9184483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MEG responses during rhythmic finger tapping in humans to phasic stimulation and their interpretation based on neural mechanisms.
    Yoshino K; Takagi K; Nomura T; Sato S; Tonoike M
    Biol Cybern; 2002 Jun; 86(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 12111276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
    Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements.
    Cramer SC; Finklestein SP; Schaechter JD; Bush G; Rosen BR
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Jan; 81(1):383-7. PubMed ID: 9914297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.