These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8036092)

  • 1. Cross-modal compatibility effects with visual-spatial and auditory-verbal stimulus and response sets.
    Proctor RW; Dutta A; Kelly PL; Weeks DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jan; 55(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8036092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias.
    Hairston WD; Wallace MT; Vaughan JW; Stein BE; Norris JL; Schirillo JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12590840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal access to verbal name codes.
    Berryhill M; Kveraga K; Webb L; Hughes HC
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 May; 69(4):628-40. PubMed ID: 17727116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of visual-verbal load and spatial compatibility on stimulus response.
    Huang WS; Hsu CC; Liu CC; Lai CH
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Apr; 108(2):487-502. PubMed ID: 21675563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):815-28. PubMed ID: 12201340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of mental representation for same and mixed compatibility assignments.
    Dornier LA; Gilmour Reeve T
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jan; 58(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8668519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Grosjean M; Mordkoff JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Aug; 27(4):870-8. PubMed ID: 11518150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 10946588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels.
    Adank P; Nuttall H; Bekkering H; Maegherman G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1290-1299. PubMed ID: 29536418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus modality and stimulus-response compatibility in absolute identification.
    Lacouture Y; Lacerte D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1997 Jun; 51(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 9340076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer of noncorresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 17201566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments.
    Ferris TK; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatiotemporal Relationships among Audiovisual Stimuli Modulate Auditory Facilitation of Visual Target Discrimination.
    Li Q; Yang H; Sun F; Wu J
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 26562250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.