215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8037229)
21. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation.
Brant J
J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Public policy and the rights of mental patients.
Brown P
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 11652366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Metaphor and madness, law and liberty.
Eastman HA
De Paul Law Rev; 1991; 40(2):281-362. PubMed ID: 16130263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
Kanter AS
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The constitutional right to treatment services for the noncommitted mentally disabled.
Esposito VM
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1980; 14(4):675-705. PubMed ID: 11651740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Community mental health treatment for the mentally ill -- when does less restrictive treatment become a right?
Seicshnaydre SE
Tulane Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 66(6):1971-2001. PubMed ID: 11660060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Gove WR; Tovo M; Hughes M
Deviant Behav; 1985; 6():287-318. PubMed ID: 11658830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Outpatient commitment: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis.
Winick BJ
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):107-44. PubMed ID: 16700139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
Appelbaum PS
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The cautious advance on the right to treatment.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Nov; 33(11):895-6. PubMed ID: 7141423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. From moral treatment to railroading out of the mental hospital.
Slovenko R; Luby ED
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1974 Dec; 2(4):223-36. PubMed ID: 4467928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication. State laws.
Arkin HR
JAMA; 1984 Nov; 252(18):2620-1. PubMed ID: 6149323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Protection and advocacy for the mentally ill: new hope for emotionally disturbed children?
Petr C; Poertner J
Community Ment Health J; 1989; 25(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 2766690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
