These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8037229)

  • 41. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states.
    Clayton T
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice.
    Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
    Herbert W
    Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The legislative tenets of client's right to treatment in the least restrictive environment and freedom from harm: implications for community providers.
    Marty DA; Chapin R
    Community Ment Health J; 2000 Dec; 36(6):545-56. PubMed ID: 11079183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Right to treatment.
    Cohen I; Cohen NL; Sadoff RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1231943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM
    Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Japan's new Mental Health Law: more light shed on dark places?
    Salzberg SM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):137-68. PubMed ID: 1864686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
    Miller RD
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patient accountability and quality of care: lessons from medical consumerism and the patients' rights, women's health and disability rights movements.
    Rodwin MA
    Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(1-2):147-67. PubMed ID: 7801975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The right to refuse antipsychotic medication: who decides?
    Zajc M
    Med Law; 1987; 6(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 2883550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. HIV infection and AIDS in the public health and health care systems: the role of law and litigation.
    Gostin LO; Webber DW
    JAMA; 1998 Apr; 279(14):1108-13. PubMed ID: 9546571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Overview: the right to treatment--comments on the law and its impact.
    Stone AA
    Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Nov; 132(11):1125-34. PubMed ID: 1166888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lawsuits try to force care for the mentally ill.
    Goleman D
    N Y Times Web; 1984 Apr; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11646287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis.
    Roberts TD
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Health care professionals and treatment of HIV-positive patients. Is there an affirmative duty to treat under common law, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act?
    White CC
    J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):67-113. PubMed ID: 10230151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.