These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038110)

  • 1. Serological findings and efficiency of DNA profiling in transfused patients and their significance for identity and paternity tests.
    Huckenbeck W; Rand S
    Int J Legal Med; 1994; 106(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 8038110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [DNA analyses in forensic investigations].
    Lindblom B; Holmlund G; Stennek A
    Lakartidningen; 1991 May; 88(22):2055-9. PubMed ID: 2051873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An unexcluded paternity case investigated with hypervariable DNA loci.
    Yokoi T; Nata M; Aoki Y; Sagisaka K
    Transfusion; 1990; 30(9):819-23. PubMed ID: 2238031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paternity testing: blood group systems and DNA analysis by variable number of tandem repeat markers.
    Akane A; Matsubara K; Shiono H; Yuasa I; Yokota S; Yamada M; Nakagome Y
    J Forensic Sci; 1990 Sep; 35(5):1217-25. PubMed ID: 1977840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fingerprints for identity determination: comparison with traditional paternity testing methods--Part II.
    Markowicz KR; Tonelli LA; Anderson MB; Green DJ; Herrin GL; Cotton RW; Gottschall JL; Garner DD
    J Forensic Sci; 1990 Nov; 35(6):1270-6. PubMed ID: 2124609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Blood group expert evaluation: relation between the extent of testing and the reliability of paternity determination. Reflections on revision and guidelines].
    Spielmann W; Kühnl P
    Z Rechtsmed; 1983; 90(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 6868832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Paternity study applying DNA polymorphism: evaluation of methods traditionally used in Chile].
    Armanet L; Aguirre R; Vargas J; Llop E; Castillo S; Cifuentes L
    Rev Med Chil; 1995 May; 123(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 8525201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prenatal paternity testing with DNA analyses.
    Nata M; Nagae M; Aoki Y; Sagisaka K; Uehara S
    Int J Legal Med; 1993; 106(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 8117596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blood grouping tests for paternity and nonpaternity.
    Sussman LN; Gilja BK
    N Y State J Med; 1981 Mar; 81(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 6938823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishing paternity using minisatellite DNA probes when the putative father is unavailable for testing.
    Odelberg SJ; Demers DB; Westin EH; Hossaini AA
    J Forensic Sci; 1988 Jul; 33(4):921-8. PubMed ID: 2902188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A report of the 1995 and 1996 Paternity Testing Workshops of the English Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics.
    Bjerre A; Court DS; Lincoln P; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Nov; 90(1-2):41-55. PubMed ID: 9438364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paternity inclusion in the presence of multiple exclusions.
    Gutendorf RW; Smith RA; Leis K; Yates J
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1991; 21(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 1830465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of single-locus hypervariable region DNA probes to deficiency cases in paternity testing.
    Yokoi T; Odaira T; Nata M; Aoki Y; Sagisaka K
    Int J Legal Med; 1991 Mar; 104(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 2054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ["Advantages" of exclusion probability in blood group evaluation?].
    Hummel K
    Z Rechtsmed; 1985; 95(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 4090759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usefulness of conventional blood groups, DNA-minisatellites, and short tandem repeat polymorphisms in paternity testing: a comparison.
    Henke L; Fimmers R; Josephi E; Cleef S; Dülmer M; Henke J
    Forensic Sci Int; 1999 Jul; 103(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 10481266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of paternity establishing without the putative father using hypervariable DNA probes.
    Yokoi T; Odaira T; Nata M; Sagisaka K
    Jinrui Idengaku Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 35(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 2266601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Paternity testing 3: exclusion probabilities.
    Brown CM; Seber GA
    Am J Med Genet; 1987 Jan; 26(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 3812556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics of a DNA probe (pa3'HVR) when used for paternity testing.
    Allen RW; Bliss B; Pearson A
    Transfusion; 1989; 29(6):477-85. PubMed ID: 2568706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rates of non-paternity.
    Lincoln PJ; Syndercombe Court D
    Lancet; 1992 Oct; 340(8827):1108. PubMed ID: 1357509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Possible pitfalls in motherless paternity analysis with related putative fathers.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Mályusz V; Simeoni E; Lignitz E; Poetsch M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):92-7. PubMed ID: 16143476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.