These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038245)

  • 1. Misclassification of exposure in case-control studies: assessment by quality indices.
    Marshall RJ
    Epidemiology; 1994 May; 5(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 8038245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misclassification of exposure in a case-control study: the effects of different types of exposure and different proxy respondents in a study of pancreatic cancer.
    Lyon JL; Egger MJ; Robison LM; French TK; Gao R
    Epidemiology; 1992 May; 3(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 1591321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size.
    Garcia-Closas M; Rothman N; Lubin J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1043-50. PubMed ID: 10613335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of exposure misclassification bias in case-control studies using validation data.
    Marshall RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1997 Jan; 50(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9048686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferences on the potential effects of presumed nondifferential exposure misclassification.
    Brenner H
    Ann Epidemiol; 1993 May; 3(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 8275202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical investigation of exposure measurement bias and its components in case-control studies.
    Marshall RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 52(6):547-50. PubMed ID: 10408994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations of relative sensitivity in detecting differential misclassification in case-control studies.
    Schwartzbaum JA; Setzer RW; Kupper LL
    Epidemiology; 1994 May; 5(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 8038246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
    Brenner H; Loomis D
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect on the stratum-specific odds ratios of nondifferential misclassification of a dichotomous covariate.
    Cox B; Elwood JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Jan; 133(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 1815535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misclassification bias arising from random error in exposure measurement: implications for dual measurement strategies.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Sep; 138(6):453-61. PubMed ID: 8213750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of odds ratios with multiple levels of exposure.
    Birkett NJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 136(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 1415154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of bias due to differential misclassification by case-control status in a case-control study.
    Chyou PH
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2007; 22(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 17225958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias from nondifferential misclassification in case-control studies with three exposure levels.
    Correa-Villaseñor A; Stewart WF; Franco-Marina F; Seacat H
    Epidemiology; 1995 May; 6(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 7619936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity analysis of misclassification: a graphical and a Bayesian approach.
    Chu H; Wang Z; Cole SR; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):834-41. PubMed ID: 16843678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential misclassification and the assessment of gene-environment interactions in case-control studies.
    García-Closas M; Thompson WD; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Mar; 147(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 9525528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind assignment of exposure does not always prevent differential misclassification.
    Wacholder S; Dosemeci M; Lubin JH
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Aug; 134(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 1877603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: "When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend?".
    Thomas DC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 142(7):782-4. PubMed ID: 7572951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential exposure misclassification in case-control studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer.
    Levois M; Switzer P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 51(1):37-54. PubMed ID: 9467633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential sensitivity of bias analysis results to incorrect assumptions of nondifferential or differential binary exposure misclassification.
    Johnson CY; Flanders WD; Strickland MJ; Honein MA; Howards PP
    Epidemiology; 2014 Nov; 25(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 25120106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Notes on the assessment of trend in the presence of nondifferential exposure misclassification.
    Brenner H
    Epidemiology; 1992 Sep; 3(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 1391134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.