These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038342)

  • 21. Validation of strain gauges as a method of measuring precision of fit of implant bars.
    Hegde R; Lemons JE; Broome JC; McCracken MS
    Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 19359866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface.
    Jemt T; Rubenstein JE; Carlsson L; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 8648581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dimensional accuracy analysis of implant framework castings from 2 casting systems.
    Chang TL; Maruyama C; White SN; Son S; Caputo AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 16274145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The precision of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface.
    May KB; Edge MJ; Russell MM; Razzoog ME; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 9151270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
    Ortorp A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stereophotogrammetry for Recording the Position of Multiple Implants: Technical Description.
    Agustín-Panadero R; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Gomar-Vercher S; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 26523726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Momen-Heravi F
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
    Takahashi T; Gunne J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients.
    Jemt T; Book K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):620-5. PubMed ID: 8908860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks (I-Bridge) in the edentulous jaw.
    Eliasson A; Wennerberg A; Johansson A; Ortorp A; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 19076180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera custom abutments and three implant systems.
    Alves da Cunha Tde M; Correia de Araújo RP; Barbosa da Rocha PV; Pazos Amoedo RM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 20977612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
    Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures.
    Helldén LB; Ericson G; Olsson CO
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Feb; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15736782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants.
    Pradíes G; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Giménez B; Martínez-Rus F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 24686966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of fit in osseointegrated implant components using torque/turn analysis.
    Wicks RA; deRijk WG; Windeler AS
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 3(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 7866503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.