These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038343)

  • 1. Digital image processing. I. Evaluation of gray level correction methods in vitro.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 8038343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital image processing. II. In vitro quantitative evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissue changes.
    Fourmousis I; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Tonetti M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Jun; 5(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 7918909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three contrast correction methods for digital subtraction in dental radiography: an in vitro study.
    Likar B; Pernus F
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 9048371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and reproducibility of the technique in quantitative densitometric measurements of the mandible in vivo.
    Verhoeven JW; Ruijter J; Cune MS; Terlou M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Oct; 11(5):476-86. PubMed ID: 11168240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Intraoral radiographs of dental implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):258-62. PubMed ID: 11837109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image processing and analysis program for measurement of bone density changes in reference and follow-up standardized extraoral oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible.
    Ruijter JM; Verhoeven JW; van der Linden JA; Cune MS; Terlou M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 15070840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Light source-induced error in computer-assisted image analysis with a video-based system.
    Stutz FA; Hefti AF; Gibbs CH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Apr; 81(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 8705599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic evaluation of implant-obscured bone. Comparison of digitally subtracted tomographic and periapical techniques.
    Ludlow JB; Gates W; Nason R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 7489280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Densitometric measurements of the mandible: accuracy and validity of intraoral versus extraoral radiographical techniques in an in vitro study.
    Verhoeven JW; Ruijter JM; Cune MS; de Putter C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Oct; 9(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 9835813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of density changes caused by methodological errors in CADIA.
    Steffensen B; Pasquali LA; Yuan C; Wood RC; Schoolfield JD; Kornman KS
    J Periodontal Res; 1989 Nov; 24(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 2531795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric alignment and chromatic calibration of serial radiographic images.
    Dornier C; Dorsaz-Brossa L; Thévenaz P; Casagni F; Brochut P; Mombelli A; Vallée J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 15533974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration.
    Economopoulos T; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):185-204. PubMed ID: 18460572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction radiography for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 8260008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of manual compared with reference point superimposition on image quality in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(4):145-50. PubMed ID: 2701173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.