These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038343)

  • 21. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast matching techniques for digital subtraction radiography: an objective evaluation.
    Likar B; Bernard R; Pernus F
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():294-8. PubMed ID: 8947675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Hildebolt CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jul; 84(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 9247959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography.
    Deserno TM; Rangarajan JR; Hoffmann J; Brägger U; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19615643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar crest obscured by dental implants.
    Ludlow JB; Nason RH; Hutchens LH; Moriarty J
    Implant Dent; 1995; 4(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 7550080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 9574959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative analysis of bone density in direct digital radiographs evaluated by means of computerized analysis of digital images.
    Morea C; Dominguez GC; Coutinho A; Chilvarquer I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 20729185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A robust generalized fuzzy operator approach to film contrast correction in digital subtraction radiography.
    Leung CC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Mar; 44(1-2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16929926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations.
    Gürdal P; Hildebolt CF; Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11175274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of the origin of trabecular bone patterns using visual and digital image analysis.
    Jett S; Shrout MK; Mailhot JM; Potter BJ; Borke JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Nov; 98(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 15529133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance for obtaining maximal gain from a program for digital subtraction radiography.
    Aagaard E; Donslund C; Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1991 Apr; 99(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 2052898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Apr; 33(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9651875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of varying gray-scale resolution for detectability of bone lesions in intraoral radiographs digitized for teletransmission.
    Wenzel A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Dec; 95(6):483-92. PubMed ID: 3480566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: mutual information as a measure of image quality.
    Armato SG; Sensakovic WF; Passen SJ; Engelmann R; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5675-82. PubMed ID: 20095280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro calibration and validation of a digital subtraction radiography system using scanned images.
    Woo BM; Zee KY; Chan FH; Corbet EF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Feb; 30(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 12622852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.