These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038430)
1. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Bichacho N Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 6(3):17-23; quiz 24. PubMed ID: 8038430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique. Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct and semi-direct posterior composite restorations. Spreafico R Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Sep; 8(7):703-12; quiz 714. PubMed ID: 9242143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations. Moosavi H; Abedini S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II direct composite resin restorations using the prepolymerized ball technique. Feinman RA Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 5(3 Suppl 1):5-11. PubMed ID: 8219156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of various adhesive composite restorations in the posterior regions. Ferrari P; Veneziani M Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 19(8):503-9; quiz 510, 501. PubMed ID: 17970485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Morgan M Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 16(3):211-7; quiz 218. PubMed ID: 15199696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A restorative approach for class II resin composite restorations: a two-year follow-up. Santos MJ Oper Dent; 2015; 40(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25100407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The proximal precinct in direct posterior composite restorations: interproximal integrity. Liebenberg WH Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 14(7):587-94; quiz 596. PubMed ID: 12373946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 11203930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]