These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8038766)
1. Subjective landmarks in perception and memory for spatial location. Bryant DJ; Subbiah I Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Mar; 48(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 8038766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Spetch ML J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1995 Apr; 21(2):166-81. PubMed ID: 7738499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spontaneous imagery scanning in mental extrapolation. Finke RA; Pinker S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1982 Mar; 8(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 6210748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there dissociation of perceptual and motor responses to figural illusions? Post RB; Welch RB Perception; 1996; 25(5):569-81. PubMed ID: 8865298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The time course of spatial memory distortions. Werner S; Diedrichsen J Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):718-30. PubMed ID: 12219889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wide-angle memories of close-up scenes. Intraub H; Richardson M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 2522508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies and biases in location memory in Williams syndrome. Farran EK Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(5):385-97. PubMed ID: 17826031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Representation of spatial structure in reaching to a visual target. Cook M; Griffiths K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1041-56. PubMed ID: 1837296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Properties of cognitive maps constructed from texts. Ferguson EL; Hegarty M Mem Cognit; 1994 Jul; 22(4):455-73. PubMed ID: 7934950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification. Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases. Motes MA; Hubbard TL; Courtney JR; Rypma B J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1076-83. PubMed ID: 18763892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Hesse FW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1035-50. PubMed ID: 12450330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies. Stins JF; van Leeuwen C Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 8433904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age and sex differences in children's spatial search strategies. Spetch ML; Parent MB Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 17328377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of size, clutter, and complexity on vanishing-point distances in visual imagery. Hubbard TL; Baird JC Psychol Res; 1993; 55(3):223-36. PubMed ID: 8416041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection. Fischer MH Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 8043264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space. Sahan MI; Verguts T; Boehler CN; Pourtois G; Fias W Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26704925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]