These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8039364)

  • 1. On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report.
    Miller JL
    Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):271-85. PubMed ID: 8039364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.
    Miller JL; Volaitis LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 2587179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: a distinction between lexical status and speaking rate.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 11521848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of training on attention to acoustic cues.
    Francis AL; Baldwin K; Nusbaum HC
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Nov; 62(8):1668-80. PubMed ID: 11140187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Miller JL; Connine CM; Schermer TM; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2124-33. PubMed ID: 6875098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.
    Xie X; Theodore RM; Myers EB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 27819457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.
    Volaitis LE; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):723-35. PubMed ID: 1506527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/.
    Iverson P; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 8609297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):349-66. PubMed ID: 11999859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal structure of phonetic categories: effects of speaking rate.
    Miller JL; O'Rourke TB; Volaitis LE
    Phonetica; 1997; 54(3-4):121-37. PubMed ID: 9396164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential.
    Sharma A; Kraus N; McGee T; Carrell T; Nicol T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 7681392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception.
    Polka L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jul; 52(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 1635856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus dominance in fused dichotic syllables: trouble for the category goodness hypothesis.
    Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jan; 67(1):288-305. PubMed ID: 7354197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain-behavior relationships in incidental learning of non-native phonetic categories.
    Luthra S; Fuhrmeister P; Molfese PJ; Guediche S; Blumstein SE; Myers EB
    Brain Lang; 2019 Nov; 198():104692. PubMed ID: 31522094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech.
    Khalighinejad B; Cruzatto da Silva G; Mesgarani N
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(8):2176-2185. PubMed ID: 28119400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonetic category activation predicts the direction and magnitude of perceptual adaptation to accented speech.
    Wu YC; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Sep; 48(9):913-925. PubMed ID: 35849375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory coding, cues, and coherence in phonetic perception.
    Sawusch JR; Gagnon DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):635-52. PubMed ID: 7790838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.
    Bürki A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1973-2004. PubMed ID: 29383571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers.
    Junqua JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):510-24. PubMed ID: 8423266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy.
    Miller JL; Eimas PD
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Nov; 58(8):1157-67. PubMed ID: 8961827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.