These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8039371)

  • 1. Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions.
    Shafir E
    Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):403-30. PubMed ID: 8039371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice.
    Shafir E; Tversky A
    Cogn Psychol; 1992 Oct; 24(4):449-74. PubMed ID: 1473331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring how students think: a new method combining think-aloud and concept mapping protocols.
    Pottier P; Hardouin JB; Hodges BD; Pistorius MA; Connault J; Durant C; Clairand R; Sebille V; Barrier JH; Planchon B
    Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 44(9):926-935. PubMed ID: 20716103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology.
    Shin HS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 31813196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mediation model to explain decision making under conditions of risk among adolescents: the role of fluid intelligence and probabilistic reasoning.
    Donati MA; Panno A; Chiesi F; Primi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 24873900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grounding judgement in context: A conceptual learning model of clinical reasoning.
    Koufidis C; Manninen K; Nieminen J; Wohlin M; Silén C
    Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 54(11):1019-1028. PubMed ID: 32403177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions.
    Byrne RM; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 8997169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is inferential reasoning just probabilistic reasoning in disguise?
    Markovits H; Handley S
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16532862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental models and probabilistic thinking.
    Johnson-Laird PN
    Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):189-209. PubMed ID: 8039361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive biases and decision making in gambling.
    Chóliz M
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 20923045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical decision making in nursing.
    Harbison J
    J Adv Nurs; 1991 Apr; 16(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 2061503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The wisdom of the crowd playing The Price Is Right.
    Lee MD; Zhang S; Shi J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):914-23. PubMed ID: 21264578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Disjunction Effect in two-stage simulated gambles. An experimental study and comparison of a heuristic logistic, Markov and quantum-like model.
    Broekaert JB; Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Mar; 117():101262. PubMed ID: 31865226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inductive reasoning 2.0.
    Hayes BK; Heit E
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 9(3):e1459. PubMed ID: 29283506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. People's thinking plans adapt to the problem they're trying to solve.
    Ongchoco JDK; Knobe J; Jara-Ettinger J
    Cognition; 2024 Feb; 243():105669. PubMed ID: 38039797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of payoffs and objective uncertainty on the latency and confidence of the subject's responses].
    Tiberghien G; Denhiere G; Verstiggel JC
    Annee Psychol; 1972; 72(2):319-36. PubMed ID: 4671384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The compatibility heuristic in non-categorical hypothetical reasoning: inferences between conditionals and disjunctions.
    Espino O; Byrne RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Nov; 67(3):98-129. PubMed ID: 23968595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.