141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8040448)
1. MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal masses.
Scoutt LM; McCarthy SM; Lange R; Bourque A; Schwartz PE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(4):609-18. PubMed ID: 8040448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limited-sequence magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the ultrasonographically indeterminate pelvic mass.
Chang SD; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Llewellyn PA; Bilbey JH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2004 Apr; 55(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 15131929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can a T2 hyperintense rim sign differentiate uterine leiomyomas from other solid adnexal masses?
Reiter MJ; Schwope RB; Lisanti CJ; Banks NB
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3182-90. PubMed ID: 26205993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.
Jain KA; Friedman DL; Pettinger TW; Alagappan R; Jeffrey RB; Sommer FG
Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):697-704. PubMed ID: 8430177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI of female uterine and juxta-uterine masses: clinical application in 25 patients.
Aubel S; Wozney P; Edwards RP
Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 9(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 1779718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate.
Weinreb JC; Barkoff ND; Megibow A; Demopoulos R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 2105017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Malek M; Pourashraf M; Mousavi AS; Rahmani M; Ahmadinejad N; Alipour A; Hashemi FS; Shakiba M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3407-12. PubMed ID: 25921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses.
Biggs WS; Marks ST
Am Fam Physician; 2016 Apr; 93(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 27175840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
