137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8040571)
1. [Value of cold-knife conization without hemostatic sutures].
Rimailho J; Puyuelo L; Escourrou G; Hoff J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8040571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Yalcin H; Cetinkaya N; Sirvan L; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Jan; 14(11):6693-6. PubMed ID: 24377590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The advantages of CO2 laser use in treatment of cervix dysplasia].
Küppers V; Degen KW; Dominik S; Sert S; Somville T
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jul; 54(7):401-5. PubMed ID: 7926572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision.
Giacalone PL; Laffargue F; Aligier N; Roger P; Combecal J; Daures JP
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 10600289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frozen section examination of the endocervical margin of cervical conization specimens.
Rouzier R; Feyereisen E; Constancis E; Haddad B; Dubois P; Paniel BJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 12893191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [LASER CONISATION VS. COLD KNIFE CONISATION FOR CIN].
Karagyozov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27514128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cold-knife conization versus photodynamic therapy with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II with associated human papillomavirus infection: a comparison of preliminary results.
Bodner K; Bodner-Adler B; Wierrani F; Kubin A; Szölts-Szölts J; Spängler B; Grünberger W
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(2C):1785-8. PubMed ID: 12820459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conservative treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using a cold-knife section technique.
Mazouni C; Porcu G; Haddad O; Dalès JP; Taranger-Charpin C; Piana L; Bonnier P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jul; 121(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 15950367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
