These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8040819)

  • 1. Assessing shade differences in acrylic resin denture and natural teeth.
    Young L; Glaros AG; Moore DJ; Collins JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jun; 71(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 8040819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection.
    Özat PB; Tuncel İ; Eroğlu E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 40(12):958-64. PubMed ID: 24127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical study to correlate maxillary anterior natural teeth with that of the commercially available acrylic and porcelain shade guides.
    Khurana PR; Thomas PV; Rao SV; Balamuragan R; Singh MP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 24171984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
    Yılmaz B; Yuzugullu B; Cınar D; Berksun S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople.
    Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shade distribution of commercial resin composites and color difference with shade guide tabs.
    Park SK; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 17993033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond Strength of Artificial Teeth Attached to a Microwave-Polymerized Denture Base Resin after Immersion in Disinfectant Solutions.
    Pero AC; Scavassin PM; Nunes ÉM; Policastro VB; Giro G; Compagnoni MA
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 25(7):576-579. PubMed ID: 26489039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing L*a*b* color coordinates for natural teeth shades and corresponding shade tabs using a spectrophotometer.
    Hassel AJ; Doz P; Nitschke I; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 19260432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
    Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fabrication of a posterior shade guide for removable partial dentures.
    Sykora O
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Aug; 50(2):287-8. PubMed ID: 6578335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Color differences between artificial and natural teeth in removable partial denture wearers.
    Ueda T; Takagi I; Ueda-Kodaira Y; Sugiyama T; Hirose N; Ogami K; Mori K; Sakurai K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 20689236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of gender and clinical experience on shade perception.
    Aswini KK; Ramanarayanan V; Rejithan A; Sajeev R; Suresh R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Nov; 31(6):608-612. PubMed ID: 31456329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.