BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8041525)

  • 1. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
    Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
    Luesley D; Downey G
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Koilocytotic atypia and underlying dysplasia.
    Shepherd J; Lynch W
    J Fam Pract; 1991 Aug; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 1890397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
    Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biologic relevance of the Bethesda System.
    Syrjänen K; Kataja V; Yliskoski M; Chang F; Syrjänen S; Saarikoski S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):675-82. PubMed ID: 1314359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
    Sherman ME; Kelly D
    Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
    Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
    J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
    Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy.
    Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
    Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
    Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.