These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1059 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8041525)
1. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women. Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report. Luesley D; Downey G J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear? Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear. Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biologic relevance of the Bethesda System. Syrjänen K; Kataja V; Yliskoski M; Chang F; Syrjänen S; Saarikoski S Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):675-82. PubMed ID: 1314359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression? Sherman ME; Kelly D Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee. Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome. Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy. Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women. Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells. Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation. Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]